PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2001British Journal of Sports Medicine369 citationsOpen Access

Clinical risk factors for hamstring muscle strain injury: a prospective study with correlation of injury by magnetic resonance imaging

GVGeoffrey M. VerrallJSJohn SlavotinekPBPeter G. Barnes

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively establish risk factors for hamstring muscle strain injury using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to define the diagnosis of posterior thigh injury. METHOD: In a prospective cohort study using two elite Australian Rules football clubs, the anthropometric characteristics and past clinical history of 114 athletes were recorded. Players were followed throughout the subsequent season, with posterior thigh injuries being documented. Hamstring intramuscular hyperintensity on T2 weighted MRI was required to meet our criteria for a definite hamstring injury. Statistical associations were sought between anthropometric and previous clinical characteristics and hamstring muscle injury. RESULTS: MRI in 32 players showed either hamstring injury (n = 26) or normal scans (n = 6). An association existed between a hamstring injury and each of the following: increasing age, being aboriginal, past history of an injury to the posterior thigh or knee or osteitis pubis (all p<0.05). These factors were still significant when players with a past history of posterior thigh injury (n = 26) were excluded. Previous back injury was associated with a posterior thigh injury that looked normal on MRI scan, but not with an MRI detected hamstring injury. CONCLUSIONS: Hamstring injuries are common in Australian football, and previous posterior thigh injury is a significant risk factor. Other factors, such as increasing age, being of aboriginal descent, or having a past history of knee injury or osteitis pubis, increase the risk of hamstring strain independently of previous posterior thigh injury. However, as the numbers in this study are small, further research is needed before definitive statements can be made.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Verrall et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a160fda8ec422d49e949260https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.35.6.435
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Intrinsic and Extrinsic Risk Factors for Muscle Strains in Australian Football2001 · 437 citations
  2. 2Hamstring injuries: radiographic, conventional tomographic, CT, and MR imaging characteristics.1995 · 110 citations
  3. 3Selective damage of fast glycolytic muscle fibres with eccentric contraction of the rabbit tibialis anterior1988 · 216 citations
  4. 4Clinical Sports Medicine2001 · 611 citations
  5. 5Causative factors in hamstring strains.1970 · 161 citations