PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 2011IEEE Transactions on Image Processing211 citationsOpen Access

The Segmentation of the Left Ventricle of the Heart From Ultrasound Data Using Deep Learning Architectures and Derivative-Based Search Methods

View Full Paper
GCGustavo CarneiroJNJacinto C. NascimentoAFA Freitas

Key Result

A new deep learning model with derivative-based search methods produced left ventricle segmentations comparable to state-of-the-art approaches using only 20 training images.

Structured PICO

P
Population
480 annotated ultrasound images of the left ventricle (long axis views), comprising 400 images from 12 sequences of diseased cases and 80 images from 2 sequences of normal cases.
I
Intervention
Deep learning architecture with derivative-based search methods for automatic segmentation of the left ventricle.
C
Comparator
Manual annotations by two experts (gold standard) and two state-of-the-art LV segmentation models.
O
Outcome
Degree of similarity between manual and automatic segmentations (sensitivity, specificity, and variations with respect to gold standard).surrogate

A novel deep learning architecture with derivative-based search methods provides accurate and efficient automatic segmentation of the left ventricle from ultrasound images.

Limitations

  • Dependence on rich and large training sets
  • Shape model dependent on the training set
  • Lack of a dynamical model

Abstract

We present a new supervised learning model designed for the automatic segmentation of the left ventricle (LV) of the heart in ultrasound images. We address the following problems inherent to supervised learning models: 1) the need of a large set of training images; 2) robustness to imaging conditions not present in the training data; and 3) complex search process. The innovations of our approach reside in a formulation that decouples the rigid and nonrigid detections, deep learning methods that model the appearance of the LV, and efficient derivative-based search algorithms. The functionality of our approach is evaluated using a data set of diseased cases containing 400 annotated images (from 12 sequences) and another data set of normal cases comprising 80 annotated images (from two sequences), where both sets present long axis views of the LV. Using several error measures to compute the degree of similarity between the manual and automatic segmentations, we show that our method not only has high sensitivity and specificity but also presents variations with respect to a gold standard (computed from the manual annotations of two experts) within interuser variability on a subset of the diseased cases. We also compare the segmentations produced by our approach and by two state-of-the-art LV segmentation models on the data set of normal cases, and the results show that our approach produces segmentations that are comparable to these two approaches using only 20 training images and increasing the training set to 400 images causes our approach to be generally more accurate. Finally, we show that efficient search methods reduce up to tenfold the complexity of the method while still producing competitive segmentations. In the future, we plan to include a dynamical model to improve the performance of the algorithm, to use semisupervised learning methods to reduce even more the dependence on rich and large training sets, and to design a shape model less dependent on the training set.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carneiro et al. (2011) studied Left ventricle segmentation in ultrasound images. Deep learning architecture and derivative-based search methods vs. Manual annotations and state-of-the-art LV segmentation models was evaluated on Degree of similarity between manual and automatic segmentations. A new deep learning model with derivative-based search methods produced left ventricle segmentations comparable to state-of-the-art approaches using only 20 training images.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1619fddca1af9bedbf9b36https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2011.2169273
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Pattern Classification2001 · 3,744 citations
  2. 2Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm1977 · 49,904 citations
  3. 3Snakes: Active contour models1988 · 17,106 citations
  4. 4Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition1990 · 11,139 citations
  5. 5An Introduction to Splines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling1987 · 1,147 citations