PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1990Agronomy Journal24 citations

Canopy Temperature and Stomatal Conductance of Water‐stressed Dormant and Nondormant Alfalfa Types

View Full Paper
MHM. J. HattendorfDEDavid W. EvansRPR. N. Peaden

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate how dormant and nondormant alfalfa types respond to water stress through canopy temperature and stomatal conductance measurements.
  • Investigation of the effects of continuous deficit irrigation using a line-source sprinkler system.
  • Assessment performed on three alfalfa types: Vernal (dormant), Vernema (intermediate), and CUF 101 (nondormant) in Prosser, WA.
  • The canopy temperature/vapor pressure deficit relationships were analyzed alongside stomatal conductance and water use metrics.
  • CUF 101 exhibited a canopy temperature 0.6 °C higher than Vernal (P=0.05).
  • Mean canopy resistance to vapor transport for CUF 101 was 33% greater than Vernal.
  • Stomatal conductance at zero Crop Water Stress Index for CUF 101 was only 60% of Vernal.

Abstract

Abstract Alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) from diverse origins may respond differently to water stress. Objectives were to assess dormant and nondormant‐type alfalfa response to water stress as inferred from canopy temperature and stomatal conductance. The effects of continuous deficit irrigation produced by a line‐source sprinkler system on ‘Vernal’ (dormant type), ‘Vernema’ (intermediate dormancy type), and ‘CUF 101’ (nondormant type) were investigated at Prosser, WA, on a Warden loam (coarse‐silty, mixed, mesic Xerollic Camborthids). Water stress was expressed as the Crop Water Stress Index ( CWSI ), a canopy‐temperature ( T c ) based indicator of water stress. The Y ‐intercepts of Vernal and CUF 101 canopy‐air temperature/vapor pressure deficit ( T c – T a VPD ) curves were significantly different ( P = 0.05) with CUF 101 0.6 °C (28.5%) higher than Vernal. Mean canopy resistance to vapor transport ( r cp ) was 33% greater for CUF 101 than for Vernal. Slopes of stomatal conductance/ CWSI curves were similar, but stomatal conductance at zero CWSI of CUF 101 was 60% of Vernal. Total water use and yields of Vernal, Vernema, and CUF 101 were not significantly different ( P = 0.05) among cultivars, although CUF 101 mean daily water use was 2.1 mm greater than Vernal water use early in the growth cycle. Higher T c for CUF 101 was consistent with lower CUF 101 stomatal conductance. The differences in T c and stomatal conductance were related to dormancy type. Lower transpiration of CUF 101 at full canopy cover has implications for development of more water‐use efficient alfalfa.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hattendorf et al. (1990) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a162d306f70b8a62ac4fd12https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200050005x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impacts of water optimization practices on soil health and soil water infiltration2026
  2. 2Integrated Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analyses Reveal Adaptive Mechanisms of Medicago sativa Under Water Stress2026
  3. 3Physiological and Biochemical Insights into Drought Tolerance of Alfalfa Cultivars with Different Sensitivities2026
  4. 4Impact of reclaimed wastewater on alfalfa production under different irrigation methods2024 · 10 citations
  5. 5Physiological and Transcriptomic Evaluation of Drought Tolerance in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and Identification of Resilient Germplasm2026