PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1996Journal of Sports Sciences973 citations

A 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running

View Full Paper
AJAndrew M. JonesJDJonathan H. Doust

Key Points

  • This study aims to identify the treadmill gradient that best reflects the energy cost of outdoor running.
  • Conducted with nine trained male runners at six velocities (2.92 to 5.0 m s-1) for 6 min with 6 min recovery.
  • Runners used a treadmill set at grades of 0%, 1%, 2%, 3% and ran once outdoors on level ground.
  • Oxygen consumption (VO2) was measured using expired air collections during runs.
  • At 1% treadmill grade, VO2 during outdoor running was not significantly different at lower velocities (2.92 and 3.33 m s-1).
  • At 3.75 m s-1, VO2 was significantly different from 0%, 2%, and 3% grades but not from 1% grade.
  • At higher velocities (4.17 to 5.0 m s-1), VO2 was greater than 0% and less than 3% grades, aligning closely with 1% grade conditions.

Abstract

When running indoors on a treadmill, the lack of air resistance results in a lower energy cost compared with running outdoors at the same velocity. A slight incline of the treadmill gradient can be used to increase the energy cost in compensation. The aim of this study was to determine the treadmill gradient that most accurately reflects the energy cost of outdoor running. Nine trained male runners, thoroughly habituated to treadmill running, ran for 6 min at six different velocities (2.92, 3.33, 3.75, 4.17, 4.58 and 5.0 m s-1) with 6 min recovery between runs. This routine was repeated six times, five times on a treadmill set at different grades (0%, 0%, 1%, 2%, 3%) and once outdoors along a level road. Duplicate collections of expired air were taken during the final 2 min of each run to determine oxygen consumption. The repeatability of the methodology was confirmed by high correlations (r = 0.99) and non-significant differences between the duplicate expired air collections and between the repeated runs at 0% grade. The relationship between oxygen uptake (VO2) and velocity for each grade was highly linear (r > 0.99). At the two lowest velocities, VO2 during road running was not significantly different from treadmill running at 0% or 1% grade, but was significantly less than 2% and 3% grade. For 3.75 m s-1, the VO2 during road running was significantly different from treadmill running at 0%, 2% and 3% grades but not from 1% grade. For 4.17 and 4.58 m s-1, the VO2 during road running was not significantly different from that at 1% or 2% grade but was significantly greater than 0% grade and significantly less than 3% grade. At 5.0 m s-1, the VO2 for road running fell between the VO2 value for 1% and 2% grade treadmill running but was not significantly different from any of the treadmill grade conditions. This study demonstrates equality of the energetic cost of treadmill and outdoor running with the use of a 1% treadmill grade over a duration of approximately 5 min and at velocities between 2.92 and 5.0 m s-1.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jones et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a164c1d512cb4f7828eb4bbhttps://doi.org/10.1080/02640419608727717
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Overground running incurs a higher energetic cost than treadmill running at a 1% grade: A comparison of running economy, oxygen cost of transport, and energy cost in endurance athletes2026
  2. 2Aerobic requirements of overground versus treadmill running1985 · 66 citations
  3. 3Beyond the 1% Treadmill Rule: Thirty Years of Evidence on Treadmill and Overground Running Economy2026
  4. 4The Oxygen required for horizontal and grade walking on a motor-driven treadmill1985 · 39 citations
  5. 5A simple method for assessing the energy cost of running during incremental tests2009 · 46 citations