PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026Nature Communications0 citationsOpen Access

Machine learning model-guided selective use of temporary diverting ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial

View Full Paper
SSShengli ShaoYLYanqi LiJLJianghao Li

Key Points

  • To assess whether a machine learning-based model can enhance the decision-making process for temporary diverting ileostomy in rectal cancer surgeries.
  • Randomized controlled trial involving 872 patients with stage I–III rectal cancer
  • Participants were randomly assigned to surgeon discretion or RTID-guided decisions
  • Final analysis included 750 patients: control group (n=368) and RTID group (n=382)
  • RTID group had a lower overall TDI rate (18.6% vs. 40.5%, P < 0.001)
  • Unnecessary stoma formation was reduced in the RTID group (17.7% vs. 41.3%, P < 0.001)
  • AL incidence was comparable between groups (2.4% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.753), indicating safety was maintained

Abstract

The appropriate use of temporary diverting ileostomy (TDI) in rectal cancer surgery lacks standardized criteria. A randomized controlled trial was performed to evaluate whether the Risk-Guided Temporary Ileostomy Decision (RTID) system, a machine learning-based anastomotic leakage (AL) prediction model, could improve the suitability of TDI utilization. A total of 872 patients with stage I–III rectal cancer undergoing anterior resection were randomized 1:1 to surgeon discretion versus RTID-guided decisions. The final analysis included 750 patients (control, n = 368; RTID, n = 382). The RTID group showed lower overall TDI rate (18.6% vs. 40.5%; P < 0.001) and unnecessary stoma formation (17.7% vs. 41.3%; P < 0.001). Although a numerical increase in necessary TDI use was observed (55.6% vs. 10.0%), this difference was not significant (P = 0.057). Critically, the incidence of the co-primary safety outcome, AL, was comparable between the RTID and control groups (2.4% vs. 2.7%; P = 0.753), indicating that the pre-specified TDI reduction endpoint was met, while the study was underpowered to formally test non-inferiority for AL. RTID offers an objective tool to support TDI decision-making without a compromise in safety. The present study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (no. NCT04999007) on August 8, 2021. Currently, there are no reliable strategies to identify patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery who would derive the most benefit from temporary diverting ileostomy (TDI). Here, the authors report a randomised controlled trial investigating the use the RTID system, a machine learning-based anastomotic leakage prediction model, to improve rectal cancer patient selection for TDI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1689ce0c924ddd1bd58745https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73565-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper