PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience0 citations

A Direction Guided Dung Beetle Optimizer for Cooperative Multi‐ UAV Path Planning in Dynamic Environments

View Full Paper
ZWZiyi WangLWLei WangJCJingcao Cai

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance cooperative multi-UAV path planning in dynamic environments using a new optimization approach.
  • Developed the direction guided dung beetle optimizer (DGDBO) for UAV path planning.
  • Integrated multiple strategies for collision avoidance and optimization.
  • Evaluated performance against six competitor algorithms in dynamic scenarios.
  • DGDBO achieved optimal results on 25 of 29 functions, ranking first in the CEC2017 benchmark.
  • Reduced mean path cost by an average of 16.4% compared to competitors.
  • Improved convergence stability by an average of 64%, statistically confirmed by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cooperative multi‐UAV path planning in dynamic environments faces severe challenges from high‐dimensional state spaces, strongly coupled spatiotemporal constraints, and the difficulty of simultaneously ensuring inter‐UAV collision avoidance and dynamic obstacle avoidance. To address these challenges, this paper proposes the direction guided dung beetle optimizer (DGDBO). Within a unified multi‐level directional regulation framework, an adaptive centripetal–centrifugal search strategy, a triangular deflection walk, and a quadratic interpolation‐based refinement operator are integrated to systematically coordinate exploration, local optima escape, and fine‐grained exploitation across different optimization stages. Furthermore, a continuous collision detection model based on spatiotemporal line segments unifies inter‐UAV and dynamic obstacle avoidance within a single analytical framework, ensuring flight safety while maintaining solution space connectivity. Evaluations on the CEC2017 benchmark suite show that DGDBO ranks first overall via the Friedman test, achieving optimal results on 25 of 29 functions with an average ranking of 1.172, outperforming the second‐best algorithm by approximately 1.97 in average ranking. In four dynamic multi‐UAV simulation scenarios of increasing complexity, DGDBO achieves the lowest mean path cost and smallest standard deviation among all six compared algorithms. Compared with the other competitor algorithms, DGDBO reduces mean path cost by an average of 16.4% and improves convergence stability by an average of 64%, with all performance advantages statistically confirmed by the Wilcoxon rank‐sum test. These results demonstrate that DGDBO provides a robust and efficient optimization solution for cooperative multi‐UAV path planning under complex dynamic constraints.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1689ce0c924ddd1bd587d5https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.70767
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1SCA: A Sine Cosine Algorithm for solving optimization problems2016 · 5,707 citations
  2. 2Multistrategy Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Path Planning of UAV in 3-D Low Altitude Urban Environment2025 · 17 citations
  3. 3A Novel Hybrid Enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization for UAV Path Planning2025 · 23 citations
  4. 4Three-dimensional collaborative path planning for multiple UCAVs based on improved artificial ecosystem optimizer and reinforcement learning2023 · 33 citations
  5. 5Grey Wolf Optimizer2014 · 19,212 citations