PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026BMC Veterinary Research0 citationsOpen Access

Initial assessment of a species-specific rebound measurement mode for non-human primates

YLYingbo LiuYSYunhao SuKZKaiming Zhang

Key Points

  • To investigate the accuracy of macaque-specific measurement mode of the iFalcon™ V100 rebound tonometer for intraocular pressure assessment.
  • IOP was increased stepwise from 5 mmHg to 90 mmHg with increments of 3–5 mmHg.
  • iFalcon™ V100 recorded six consecutive rebound readings at each target pressure over a 10-second stabilization period.
  • Results were compared using linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses against a high-precision invasive pressure sensor.
  • The iFalcon™ V100 showed a strong positive correlation with the invasive sensor (y = 0.99x + 0.42, R² = 0.99).
  • Mean difference was −0.036 mmHg with 95% limits of agreement from -3.747 to 3.675 mmHg.
  • Agreement was excellent in the 5–30 mmHg range, maintaining acceptable agreement up to 90 mmHg.

Abstract

Abstract Background Accurate measurement of intraocular pressure in non-human primates is of significant importance in veterinary clinical practice, particularly for the prevention, detection, and management of glaucoma in non-human primates. However, no veterinary tonometer is currently designed specifically for non-human primates. Objective To investigate the accuracy of the macaque-specific measurement mode of the iFalcon™ V100 rebound tonometer. Methods IOP was increased stepwise from 5 mmHg to 90 mmHg in 3–5 mmHg increments. At each target pressure, the system was stabilized for 10 s, then the iFalcon™ V100 recorded six consecutive rebound readings and their average. Each step yielded 2–3 such average values. The results were compared with a high-precision invasive pressure sensor. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses were performed, and the measurement range was stratified (5–30, 30–60, 60–90 mmHg) for refined assessment. Results The iFalcon™ V100 showed strong positive correlation with the invasive sensor (y = 0.99x + 0.42, R² = 0.99). The mean difference was − 0.036 mmHg (95% limits of agreement: -3.747 to 3.675 mmHg). Within the 5–30 mmHg range, agreement was excellent (mean difference: -0.063 mmHg). Acceptable agreement was maintained up to 90 mmHg. Conclusions This ex vivo study provides an initial assessment of the iFalcon™ V100 rebound tonometer in non-human primate eyes. The device showed good correlation and agreement with an invasive pressure sensor across a wide pressure range. While the sample size was limited, these preliminary findings support the potential of this species-specific measurement mode for IOP assessment in non-human primate research. Further studies with more eyes and in vivo conditions are needed to confirm its reliability and repeatability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1689ce0c924ddd1bd587e5https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-026-05578-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Validation of the Reichert® Tono‐Vera® Vet rebound tonometer in normal ex vivo canine eyes2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure with the rebound tonometer and the applanation tonometer in normal dogs2011 · 61 citations
  3. 3Macular Thickness and Its Associated Factors in a Healthy Cynomolgus Colony: The Non-Human Primates Eye Study2025 · 3 citations
  4. 4Reproducibility and Clinical Evaluation of Rebound Tonometry2005 · 202 citations
  5. 5Intraocular pressure2008 · 153 citations