PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026Architecture0 citationsOpen Access

Intelligent Ecologies in Architecture: From Traditional Ecological Knowledge to Circular Design

View Full Paper
ABAlessio Battistella

Key Points

  • The study aims to reconceptualize Intelligent Ecologies by integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge with circular design principles.
  • Developed a conceptual framework linking TEK, vernacular architecture, and circular economy theory.
  • Analyzed two case studies: ARCò kindergarten and Parabase Elementa housing project, focusing on ecological and material constraints.
  • Evaluated how natural and collective intelligence contributes to architectural practices.
  • Circularity is evidenced as an outcome of design defined by ecological constraints rather than added sustainability features.
  • Demonstrated that architecture can serve as a pivotal element in socio-ecological systems through adaptive and regenerative practices.

Abstract

The accelerating climate crisis and resource depletion demand new architectural paradigms that move beyond linear models of production and consumption. While the concept of Intelligent Ecologies is often associated with digital and artificial intelligence systems, this study reinterprets it through the lens of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK), vernacular architecture, and constraint-based innovation. Grounded in a critical reading of key references in ecological knowledge, vernacular studies, circular economy theory, and responsible innovation, the paper develops a conceptual framework tracing a trajectory from TEK to adaptive and circular design. Two architectural case studies, the ARCò kindergarten in Sant’Alessio (biological cycle) and the Parabase Elementa housing project in Basel (technical cycle), are analysed to demonstrate how natural and collective intelligence can be operationalised in contemporary practice. The findings show that circularity emerges not as an added sustainability layer but as the logical outcome of design under ecological and material constraints. The study concludes that Intelligent Ecologies should be understood as socio-ecological systems in which architecture participates in living processes through adaptive, regenerative, and temporally open strategies, thereby repositioning innovation as continuity with historically embedded forms of ecological intelligence rather than technological rupture.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alessio Battistella (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1689eb0c924ddd1bd589ffhttps://doi.org/10.3390/architecture6020079
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper