PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Risk Assessment Method for Global Monkeypox Importation into China - May 2022-September 2025.

View Full Paper
SSShihui ShanYZY ZhangYWYanhe Wang

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a dynamic risk assessment framework for evaluating monkeypox importation into China.
  • Developed an importation risk assessment framework using Delphi expert consultation to select key indicators.
  • Applied the framework to the monkeypox epidemic from May 2022 to September 2025 under various risk scenarios.
  • Analyzed source countries, provincial risk distributions, and the relationship between importation risks and domestic mpox cases.
  • Identified key shifts in monkeypox importation risk sources during the study period.
  • Revealed significant regional differences in mpox risk levels across various provinces in China.
  • Provided a structured framework for prioritized screening and targeted surveillance in high-risk areas.

Abstract

Introduction: In the context of globalization, the risk of cross-border transmission of infectious diseases is continuously increasing. There is an urgent need to develop a scientific, dynamic, and practical tool that captures regional heterogeneity in importation risk, thereby facilitating more targeted prevention and control measures at ports of entry. Methods: We devised an extensible importation risk assessment framework by selecting key indicators through a Delphi expert consultation process and assigning their respective weights using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Taking monkeypox (mpox) as a case study, we applied the framework to the global mpox epidemic spanning from May 2022 to September 2025 under three risk scenarios: Clade I, Clade II, and a non-clade-specific (aggregated) scenario. We then analyzed the temporal evolution of major source countries, the spatial distributions of provincial risk levels, and the association between clade-specific importation risk indices and domestically reported mpox cases across the study period. Results: =0.12). Conclusion: This framework effectively captures the structural shift in the sources of mpox importation risk and the regional heterogeneity in risk levels across PLADs in China. It thereby provides a risk-driven decision-support framework for prioritizing port-of-entry screening and tailoring surveillance strategies to high-risk areas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1689eb0c924ddd1bd58a32https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2026.101
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessment of Cross-Border Monkeypox Importation Risk: A Modeling Study — Worldwide, 2022–20252026
  2. 2The risk of mpox importation and subsequent outbreak potential in Chinese mainland: a retrospective statistical modelling study2024 · 9 citations
  3. 3Spatiotemporal Transmission Characteristics of Global Monkeypox — Worldwide, January 2022–September 20252026
  4. 4A Successful Cross-Agency Model for Collaborative Response to Imported Infectious Disease: Investigation and Management of the First Confirmed Clade Ia Mpox Case in Shanghai, China2026
  5. 5Analysing monkeypox epidemic drivers: Policy simulation and multi-index modelling across 39 nations2024 · 8 citations