PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026Education Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Do Talent Beliefs Differ Between In-Service and Pre-Service Teachers?

View Full Paper
JKJulia KlugSRSilke RoglKHKathrin Claudia Hamader

Key Points

  • This study investigates how talent beliefs differ between in-service and pre-service teachers, focusing on sources, structure, and levels.
  • 307 in-service teachers and 215 pre-service teachers participated
  • Completed validated talent beliefs instruments across verbal and mathematical domains
  • Analyzed invariant factor structures and conducted latent mean comparisons.
  • Pre-service teachers reported different talent beliefs compared to in-service teachers
  • In-service teachers emphasized domain-specific skills and influence of passion for verbal talent
  • Pre-service teachers focused on external influences from teachers and internal factors for mathematical talent.

Abstract

There is limited understanding regarding whether and how teachers’ talent beliefs evolve across career stages. While most prior research conceptualizes talent beliefs across domains, emerging frameworks emphasize field-specific talent beliefs. An established multidimensional model of talent beliefs provides a theoretically grounded structure for capturing these domain-specific perceptions. Yet comparative evidence across teacher career stages remains limited. Our study examines if verbal and mathematical talent beliefs among in-service teachers and pre-service teachers differ in terms of sources, structure and levels. A total of 307 in-service teachers and 215 pre-service teachers completed validated six-dimensional talent beliefs instruments for both domains and reported sources of their beliefs. Participants—especially pre-service teachers—most strongly attributed their talent beliefs to personal school experiences, while educational science and subject-didactic coursework played a marginal role. Both the mathematical and verbal talent belief scales demonstrated configural and metric invariance, supporting equivalent factor structures and factor loadings across pre-service teachers and in-service teachers. Latent mean comparisons showed that pre-service teachers hold systematically different talent beliefs in comparison to in-service teachers. In-service teachers emphasize talent beliefs concerning domain-specific skills and, for verbal talent, passion—consistent with contemporary talent development frameworks—whereas pre-service teachers focus on external teacher influence and, for mathematical talent, on internal factors. These findings reinforce theoretical claims that talent beliefs are experience-sensitive, multidimensional constructs shaped through socialization in educational contexts. Teacher (further) education should deliberately address the dominance of personal schooling experiences by fostering structured reflection, explicitly targeting belief formation in practice-based courses, and ensuring coherence between higher-education instruction and school-based experiences. Teachers’ impact on their students’ talent development should especially be reflected in further education, since in-service teachers assess their own influence as lower than pre-service teachers do; additionally, passion as a key driver of talent development and the relevance of talent domains should already be highlighted in initial teacher education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Klug et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a168ae40c924ddd1bd59abdhttps://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050799
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper