PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Epistemic Horizon Theory: Informational Accessibility, Formal Saturation, and Observer-Bounded Knowledge

View Full Paper
LHLouis-Paul Hayoun

Key Points

  • The aim is to establish a framework for understanding informational accessibility limits in various domains.
  • Develops Epistemic Horizon Theory through analysis in formal mathematics, computation, physics, and cognition.
  • Introduces key concepts such as the Axiomatic Saturation Threshold and algorithmic horizons.
  • Examines how observer-bound limits affect access to information and properties.
  • Identifies that epistemic horizons arise when resolving a property exceeds observer capacity.
  • Compares concepts like Gödelian incompleteness and quantum measurement under the lens of accessibility structure.
  • Establishes a diagnosis rather than a reductionist view of different accessibility limits.

Abstract

This preprint introduces Epistemic Horizon Theory (EHT) as a foundational structural framework for studying limits of informational accessibility across formal mathematics, computation, physics, quantum theory, cognition, and biological perception. EHT analyzes cases in which a property, structure, truth, or information state may be well-defined, real, determinate, or physically present, while remaining inaccessible to a bounded observer or access system under a given representation, partition, and resource regime. Its central schema is that an epistemic horizon emerges when the cost of resolving a property exceeds the accessible capacity of the observer or access system. The paper develops EHT through several domains: formal systems and proof certification, the Axiomatic Saturation Threshold, computational irreducibility and algorithmic horizons, the Riemann Hypothesis as a boundary object, black-hole informational accessibility, the Schwarzschild surface as a physical analogue of an epistemic boundary, quantum measurement and entanglement, and cognitive or conscious-access limits. The framework is comparative and diagnostic rather than reductive. It does not claim that Gödelian incompleteness, computational undecidability, black-hole horizons, quantum measurement, and conscious access share the same mechanism. Instead, it compares them at the level of accessibility structure: observer, system, property, representation, partition, cost, and capacity. This version is deposited as preprint v1.0 for scholarly discussion, citation, criticism, and future formal development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Louis-Paul Hayoun (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a168b040c924ddd1bd59ca9https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20378258
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper