PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026Iconic Research and Engineering Journals0 citations

Barriers At the Interface: Challenges Faced by Visually Challenged Students in Accessing ICT Services at Kenyan Public Universities and Implications for Inclusive Policy Reform

ESE. M. Savatia

Key Points

  • The aim is to identify barriers preventing visually challenged students from accessing ICT services in Kenyan public universities.
  • Multi-stakeholder primary research involving 54 visually challenged students, 10 lecturers, and 4 ICT experts.
  • Thematic analysis of interview data and systematic observation to identify challenge domains.
  • Development of a barrier typology distinguishing structural, institutional, technical, and social barriers.
  • Identified seven main challenges, including inadequate assistive technology provisioning and inaccessible digital content.
  • Mapped barriers against the frameworks of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and local legislation.
  • Provided policy recommendations targeting university management and educational authorities.

Abstract

Despite decades of international normative pressure and domestic legislation, visually challenged students (VCS) in Kenyan public universities continue to encounter profound barriers in accessing ICT services essential to academic participation. This paper presents an in-depth analysis of the challenges experienced by VCS at Kenyatta University and Maseno University, drawing on multi-stakeholder primary research involving 54 VCS, 10 lecturers, 4 ICT experts, 4 student guides, and 2 senior university administrators. Through thematic analysis of interview data and systematic observation, the study identifies seven interconnected challenge domains: (1) inadequate assistive technology provisioning; (2) inaccessible digital content and learning management systems; (3) deficient ICT support staff competence; (4) restrictive physical access environments; (5) insufficient institutional financial commitment; (6) absence of tailored ICT curricula for VCS; and (7) the compounding social burden of dependency on sighted guides. The paper develops a barrier typology that distinguishes between structural, institutional, technical, and social barriers, and maps these against the frameworks of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), Kenya's Persons with Disabilities Act (2003), and the WCAG 2.1 accessibility guidelines. Policy recommendations are addressed to university management, the Commission for University Education, the Ministry of Education, and the Kenya Institute of Special Education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

E. M. Savatia (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a168b430c924ddd1bd5a2ebhttps://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i11-1718266
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper