PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 29, 2016Hydrology and earth system sciences105 citationsOpen Access

Development and verification of a real-time stochastic precipitation nowcasting system for urban hydrology in Belgium

View Full Paper
LFLoris ForestiMRMaarten ReyniersASAlan Seed

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract. The Short-Term Ensemble Prediction System (STEPS) is implemented in real-time at the Royal Meteorological Institute (RMI) of Belgium. The main idea behind STEPS is to quantify the forecast uncertainty by adding stochastic perturbations to the deterministic Lagrangian extrapolation of radar images. The stochastic perturbations are designed to account for the unpredictable precipitation growth and decay processes and to reproduce the dynamic scaling of precipitation fields, i.e., the observation that large-scale rainfall structures are more persistent and predictable than small-scale convective cells. This paper presents the development, adaptation and verification of the STEPS system for Belgium (STEPS-BE). STEPS-BE provides in real-time 20-member ensemble precipitation nowcasts at 1 km and 5 min resolutions up to 2 h lead time using a 4 C-band radar composite as input. In the context of the PLURISK project, STEPS forecasts were generated to be used as input in sewer system hydraulic models for nowcasting urban inundations in the cities of Ghent and Leuven. Comprehensive forecast verification was performed in order to detect systematic biases over the given urban areas and to analyze the reliability of probabilistic forecasts for a set of case studies in 2013 and 2014. The forecast biases over the cities of Leuven and Ghent were found to be small, which is encouraging for future integration of STEPS nowcasts into the hydraulic models. Probabilistic forecasts of exceeding 0.5 mm h−1 are reliable up to 60–90 min lead time, while the ones of exceeding 5.0 mm h−1 are only reliable up to 30 min. The STEPS ensembles are slightly under-dispersive and represent only 75–90 % of the forecast errors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Foresti et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16a73183b2be9fec6b512fhttps://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-505-2016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Temporal and spatial resolution of rainfall measurements required for urban hydrology2004 · 401 citations
  2. 2Evaluating Mesoscale NWP Models Using Kinetic Energy Spectra2004 · 1,079 citations
  3. 3Stochastic description of the rainfall input errors in lumped hydrological models2001 · 45 citations
  4. 4Retrieval of analogue radar images for ensemble nowcasting of orographic rainfall2013 · 47 citations
  5. 5Formulation and evaluation of a scale decomposition-based stochastic precipitation nowcast scheme2013 · 124 citations