PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 12, 202140 citations

Counterfactual Graphs for Explainable Classification of Brain Networks

View Full Paper
CACarlo AbrateFBFrancesco Bonchi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Training graph classifiers able to distinguish between healthy brains and dysfunctional ones, can help identifying substructures associated to specific cognitive phenotypes. However, the mere predictive power of the graph classifier is of limited interest to the neuroscientists, which have plenty of tools for the diagnosis of specific mental disorders. What matters is the interpretation of the model, as it can provide novel insights and new hypotheses. In this paper we propose counterfactual graphs as a way to produce local post-hoc explanations of any black-box graph classifier. Given a graph and a black-box, a counterfactual is a graph which, while having high structural similarity with the original graph, is classified by the black-box in a different class. We propose and empirically compare several strategies for counterfactual graph search. Our experiments against a white-box classifier with known optimal counterfactual, show that our methods, although heuristic, can produce counterfactuals very close to the optimal one. Finally, we show how to use counterfactual graphs to build global explanations correctly capturing the behaviour of different black-box classifiers and providing interesting insights for the neuroscientists.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abrate et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16d9f5c23c548e2a7b9625https://doi.org/10.1145/3447548.3467154
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper