PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1989Multivariate Behavioral Research339 citations

A Comparison of Alternatives to Conducting Monte Carlo Analyses for Determining Parallel Analysis Criteria

View Full Paper
GLGary J. Lautenschlager

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The parallel analysis method for determining the number of components to retain in a principal components analysis has received a recent resurgence of support and interest. However, researchers and practitioners desiring to use this criterion have been hampered by the required Monte Carlo analyses needed to develop the criteria. Two recent attempts at presenting regression estimation methods to determine eigenvalues were found to be deficient in several respects, and less accurate in general, than a simple linear interpolation of tabled random data eigenvalues generated through Monte Carlo simulation. Other methods for determining the parallel analysis criteria are discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gary J. Lautenschlager (1989) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16da72c7240d1a707bb2f3https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2403_6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper