PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 5, 2026Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Study of the Perioperative Care of Head and Neck Surgical Patients with and without Central Venous Pressure Line

AAAmjad AliMKMuhammad KhurramFKFozia Anis Khan

Key Result

Central venous pressure line insertion in major head and neck surgery patients was associated with significantly higher rates of perioperative hypotension (50% vs 15%) and greater estimated blood loss.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=60)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does central venous pressure (CVP) line insertion improve perioperative care in patients undergoing elective major head and neck surgery?

P
Population
60 patients undergoing elective major head and neck surgery
I
Intervention
Central venous pressure (CVP) line insertion
C
Comparator
No central venous pressure (CVP) line insertion
O
Outcome
Perioperative patient care assessed by clinical parameters (perioperative hypotension, oliguria, and transfusion requirement) and laboratory parameters (pre and post operative hemoglobin, and estimated blood loss)

CVP line insertion in major head and neck surgery is associated with higher baseline comorbidities and does not improve perioperative clinical or laboratory outcomes.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 50% vs 15%

p-value: p=<0.05

Limitations

  • Non-randomized design with significant baseline differences in co-morbidities between groups
  • Other complications of CVP line placement were not investigated

Abstract

Background: To study the practice of central venous pressure (CVP) line insertion in perioperative head and neck surgical patients. Methods: In this comparative study, patients undergoing elective major head and neck surgery were divided into two groups. Group I (n=22) included those with CVP line insertion and Group II (n=38) without CVP line insertion.Perioperative patient care was assessed in terms of clinical (perioperative hypotension, oliguria, and transfusion requirement) and laboratory parameters (pre and post operative hemoglobin, and estimated blood loss).Results: No significant difference was noted between the two groups in terms of age, gender, weight, and pre-operative hemoglobin levels. Both groups differed significantly in terms of co morbidities (68%:36%, p<0.05), hypotension (50%:15%, p<0.05), oliguria (31.8%:7.8%, p<0.05), post operative haemoglobin (9.75±1.10:10.52±1.11g, p<0.05), and estimated blood loss (846 ±420:588±290 ml, p<0.05). Conclusion: CVP line insertion in major head and neck surgery patients is influenced by presence of co-morbidities. Perioperative patient care does not improve with CVP line insertion. Key Words: Central Venous Pressure, Head and Neck, Surgery, Co-morbidity

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ali et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Elective major head and neck surgery (n=60). Central venous pressure (CVP) line insertion vs. No CVP line insertion was evaluated on Perioperative hypotension (p=<0.05). Central venous pressure line insertion in major head and neck surgery patients was associated with significantly higher rates of perioperative hypotension (50% vs 15%) and greater estimated blood loss.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16e2022fcf950e000563c8https://doi.org/10.37939/jrmc.v16i2.3262
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper