PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2017European Journal of Heart Failure31 citationsOpen Access

Tailoring Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Therapy in Heart Failure Patients: Are We Moving Towards a Personalized Approach?

View Full Paper
JFJoão Pedro FerreiraRMRobert J. MentzAPAnne Pizard

Key Result

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists should be provided to most HFrEF patients and considered for symptomatic HFpEF patients with elevated natriuretic peptides, pending further targeted trials.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of personalized approaches in MRA therapy for heart failure patients.
  • Reviewed landmark trials and their application in heart failure treatment.
  • Proposed targeting specific subpopulations for trials.
  • Suggests criteria for selecting patients likely to benefit from MRAs.
  • Current 'one size fits all' MRA management has inconsistent results in HFpEF.
  • Personalized MRA management could improve outcomes and reduce side effects.
  • Symptomatic HFpEF patients with elevated natriuretic peptides may benefit from spironolactone.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients with heart failure, including heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and acute heart failure
I
Intervention
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs)

This review emphasizes the transition from a 'one size fits all' approach to personalized mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy in heart failure to optimize outcomes and minimize side effects.

Limitations

  • Personalization of pharmacotherapy regimens remains poorly defined in the cardiovascular field.

Abstract

The aim of personalized medicine is to offer a tailored approach to each patient in order to provide the most effective therapy, while reducing risks and side effects. The use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) has demonstrated major benefits in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), results with challenging inconsistencies in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and 'neutral' preliminary results in acute heart failure. Data derived from landmark trials are generally applied in a 'one size fits all' manner and the development and implementation of more personalized MRA management would offer the potential to improve outcomes and reduce side effects. However, the personalization of pharmacotherapy regimens remains poorly defined in the cardiovascular field (in light of current knowledge) and until further trials targeting specific subpopulations have been conducted, MRAs should be provided to the great majority of HFrEF patients in the absence of contraindication. Spironolactone should be considered for symptomatic HFpEF patients with elevated natriuretic peptides. In the near future, trials should target HFrEF patients using exclusion criteria sourced from landmark trials (e.g. severe renal impairment), select more homogeneous HFpEF populations (e.g. with elevated BNP and structural abnormalities on echocardiography), and determine which patients are likely to benefit from MRAs (e.g. according to prespecified biomarkers).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ferreira et al. (2017) conducted a review in Heart failure. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) was evaluated. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists should be provided to most HFrEF patients and considered for symptomatic HFpEF patients with elevated natriuretic peptides, pending further targeted trials.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16f2ba0f965e9c137bc8b9https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.814
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper