PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 2026PLOS Digital Health0 citationsOpen Access

Longitudinal changes in motivational determinants of sustainable diets during a pilot blended digital behavior change intervention: A mixed methods study

View Full Paper
LBLaura BervianUFUjué FresánJBJoren Buekers

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The adoption of sustainable diets in high-income countries is an urgent environmental and health priority. Understanding motivational determinants in behavior change interventions can contribute to clarifying the main pathways to effective dietary transformation. Yet, longitudinal mixed-methods evidence on motivational shifts during digital behavior change interventions remains scarce. This mixed methods study explored longitudinal motivational determinants change during a year-long blended digital intervention promoting sustainable diet change in healthy omnivorous adults. The 22-week intervention comprised app-delivered motivational and informational text messages (focusing on self-monitoring, information about health and environmental consequences and instructions on how to perform a behavior), and tailored online feedback sessions. Quantitative data were collected through repeated self-reports of diet and motivational determinants (e.g., health, environmental, ethical, price, self-efficacy, and habit strength) over 15 weeks and analyzed with linear mixed models and within-person network analysis. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews at baseline, post-intervention, and six-month follow-up were analyzed using framework analysis. Quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated using joint display techniques. Group-level quantitative analyses demonstrated small (0.02–0.04 points/week on a 0–10 scale) but significant increases in environmental and ethical motivations, habit strength, and adherence to a more sustainable diet, alongside a decrease in price as motivation for food choice. No significant change was found in health motivation and self-efficacy. These quantitative shifts were complemented by qualitative findings providing an in-depth understanding of participants’ evolving awareness, gradual adoption of new eating habits, and varying confidence in maintaining behavior changes despite contextual barriers. Individual-level results showed important heterogeneity of both motives and behaviors, and within-person network analysis showed no covariation between motivational determinant change and diet change. This study demonstrates the potential for blended digital interventions to influence motivational pathways related to sustainable diets and supports using mixed methods designs to track the dynamic dietary behavior change process.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bervian et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a172feeebb2105c0b2c2781https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001113
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Mixed Methods Research Workbook: Activities for Designing, Implementing, and Publishing Projects2020 · 249 citations
  2. 2Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: Social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior2007 · 504 citations
  3. 3Mediterranean Diet Adherence in Cardiac Patients: A Cross-sectional Study2018 · 7 citations
  4. 4Food choice motives including sustainability during purchasing are associated with a healthy dietary pattern in French adults2017 · 113 citations
  5. 5Power analysis for idiographic (within-subject) clinical trials: Implications for treatments of rare conditions and precision medicine2022 · 12 citations