PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 13, 2015Frontiers in Human Neuroscience71 citationsOpen Access

Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: an eye movement study of sentence reading

GCGeorgie ColumbusNSNaveed SheikhḾMarilena Cà ́té-Lecaldare

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Metaphors are common elements of language that allow us to creatively stretch the limits of word meaning. However, metaphors vary in their degree of novelty, which determines whether people must create new meanings on-line or retrieve previously known metaphorical meanings from memory. Such variations affect the degree to which general cognitive capacities such as executive control are required for successful comprehension. We investigated whether individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing using eye movement measures of reading. Thirty-nine participants read sentences including metaphors or idioms, another form of figurative language that is more likely to rely on meaning retrieval. They also completed the AX-CPT, a domain-general executive control task. In Experiment 1, we examined sentences containing metaphorical or literal uses of verbs, presented with or without prior context. In Experiment 2, we examined sentences containing idioms or literal phrases for the same participants to determine whether the link to executive control was qualitatively similar or different to Experiment 1. When metaphors were low familiar, all people read verbs used as metaphors more slowly than verbs used literally (this difference was smaller for high familiar metaphors). Executive control capacity modulated this pattern in that high executive control readers spent more time reading verbs when a prior context forced a particular interpretation (metaphorical or literal), and they had faster total metaphor reading times when there was a prior context. Interestingly, executive control did not relate to idiom processing for the same readers. Here, all readers had faster total reading times for high familiar idioms than literal phrases. Thus, executive control relates to metaphor but not idiom processing for these readers, and for the particular metaphor and idiom reading manipulations presented.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Columbus et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1733ae2eeb9b84e0bb89f6https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01057
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Understanding figurative language: from metaphors to idioms2002 · 603 citations
  2. 2Comprehension of idiomatic expressions: Effects of predictability and literality.1994 · 95 citations
  3. 3Working Memory Constraints on the Resolution of Lexical Ambiguity: Maintaining Multiple Interpretations in Neutral Contexts1994 · 269 citations
  4. 4The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill.1991 · 311 citations
  5. 5The comprehension of idioms1988 · 493 citations