PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 27, 2016Neurology142 citations

Safety and efficacy of thrombolysis in telestroke

View Full Paper
JKJessica KepplingerKBKristian BarlinnSDStefanie Deckert

Key Result

Telemedicine-guided IV thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke had similar rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage compared to stroke center administration (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.37-2.80; p=0.978).

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=1,863)

Structured PICO

Does telemedicine-guided IV thrombolysis with tPA improve outcomes or safety in patients with acute ischemic stroke compared to IV thrombolysis at stroke centers?

P
Population
1,863 patients with acute ischemic stroke from 7 studies (prospective randomized controlled and nonrandomized studies)
I
Intervention
Telemedicine-guided IV thrombolysis (IVT) with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), largely restricted to the 3-hour time window
C
Comparator
IV thrombolysis (IVT) administered at stroke centers
O
Outcome
Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, mortality, and functional independence (modified Rankin Scale scores 0-1) at 3 monthshard clinical

Telemedicine-guided IV thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke within the 3-hour window is as safe and effective as thrombolysis administered at stroke centers.

Main Result

Effect estimate: RR 1.01 (95% CI 0.37-2.80)

p-value: p=0.978

Limitations

  • Lack of prospective trials in the 3- to 4.5-hour time window
  • Lack of prospective trials

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IV thrombolysis (IVT) with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) delivered through telestroke networks in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches on MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases covered prospective randomized controlled and nonrandomized studies comparing telemedicine-guided IVT to IVT administered at stroke centers and were published from the earliest date available until April 1, 2015. Outcomes of interest were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, mortality, and functional independence (modified Rankin Scale scores 0-1) at 3 months. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compute pooled effect estimates and the I(2) statistic to assess heterogeneity. RESULTS: Of 529 records identified, 7 studies totaling 1,863 patients fulfilled our eligibility criteria. Among these, thrombolysis was largely restricted to the 3-hour time window. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates were similar between patients subjected to telemedicine-guided IVT and those receiving tPA at stroke centers (risk ratio RR = 1.01, 95% confidence interval CI 0.37-2.80; p = 0.978) with low evidence of heterogeneity (I(2) = 37%; p = 0.189). There was no difference in mortality (RR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.74-1.48; p = 0.806) or in functional independence (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.78-1.57; p = 0.565) at 3 months between telemedicine-guided and stroke center thrombolysis. No heterogeneity was identified (I(2) = 0%, p = 0.964 and I(2) = 52%, p = 0.123, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that IV tPA delivery through telestroke networks is safe and effective in the 3-hour time window. Lack of prospective trials, however, emphasizes the need to further substantiate these findings in the 3- to 4.5-hour time window. PROSPERO REGISTRATION INFORMATION: URL: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO. Unique identifier: CRD42015017232.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kepplinger et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in acute ischemic stroke (n=1,863). telemedicine-guided IV thrombolysis (IVT) with tPA vs. IVT administered at stroke centers was evaluated on symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.37-2.80, p=0.978). Telemedicine-guided IV thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke had similar rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage compared to stroke center administration (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.37-2.80; p=0.978).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a175f9dcf49e78c48b3f81ehttps://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000003148
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials2014 · 2,784 citations
  2. 2Geographic Access to Acute Stroke Care in the United States2014 · 208 citations
  3. 3Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials2016 · 7,818 citations
  4. 4Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses2003 · 64,028 citations
  5. 5Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions2008 · 25,253 citations