PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 7, 1999Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences613 citationsOpen Access

Bacterial diversity within the human subgingival crevice

View Full Paper
IKIan KroesPLPaul W. LeppDRDavid A. Relman

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Molecular, sequence-based environmental surveys of microorganisms have revealed a large degree of previously uncharacterized diversity. However, nearly all studies of the human endogenous bacterial flora have relied on cultivation and biochemical characterization of the resident organisms. We used molecular methods to characterize the breadth of bacterial diversity within the human subgingival crevice by comparing 264 small subunit rDNA sequences from 21 clone libraries created with products amplified directly from subgingival plaque, with sequences obtained from bacteria that were cultivated from the same specimen, as well as with sequences available in public databases. The majority (52.5%) of the directly amplified 16S rRNA sequences were <99% identical to sequences within public databases. In contrast, only 21.4% of the sequences recovered from cultivated bacteria showed this degree of variability. The 16S rDNA sequences recovered by direct amplification were also more deeply divergent; 13.5% of the amplified sequences were more than 5% nonidentical to any known sequence, a level of dissimilarity that is often found between members of different genera. None of the cultivated sequences exhibited this degree of sequence dissimilarity. Finally, direct amplification of 16S rDNA yielded a more diverse view of the subgingival bacterial flora than did cultivation. Our data suggest that a significant proportion of the resident human bacterial flora remain poorly characterized, even within this well studied and familiar microbial environment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kroes et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a179148cf49e78c48b433bbhttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.25.14547
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Taxonomic Note: A Place for DNA-DNA Reassociation and 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis in the Present Species Definition in Bacteriology1994 · 7,100 citations
  2. 2Investigation of the influences of puberty, genetics, and environment on the composition of subgingival periodontal floras1993 · 47 citations
  3. 3Characterization of Some Actinomyces-Like Isolates from Human Clinical Specimens: Reclassification of Actinomyces suis (Soltys and Spratling) as Actinobaculum suis comb. nov. and Description of Actinobaculum schaalii sp. nov.1997 · 156 citations
  4. 4Bias caused by template annealing in the amplification of mixtures of 16S rRNA genes by PCR1996 · 1,908 citations
  5. 5Phylogenetic Stains: Ribosomal RNA-Based Probes for the Identification of Single Cells1989 · 1,238 citations