PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2011Socio-Economic Review262 citations

E pluribus unum? A critical survey of job quality indicators

View Full Paper
RBRafael Muñoz de BustilloEFEnrique Fernández‐MacíasFEFernando Esteve

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In recent years, there has been growing concern in Europe about the lack of an established comparable measure of job quality to complement the widely accepted quantitative indicators in the formulation and evaluation of European employment policies. The aim of this paper is to offer a guided tour around the different views and existing proposals of job quality indicators, mainly from a European perspective. First, we discuss the methodological decisions that have to be made in the process of designing an indicator of job quality, from both a theoretical and methodological/technical perspective. Second, these arguments are used to discuss critically the different empirical approaches to the measurement of job quality proposed in the literature. We finish by presenting some recommendations for the construction of a job quality index for policy purposes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bustillo et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17cf48cf02a40e68b437cehttps://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr005
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Good Jobs, Bad Jobs, No Jobs1979 · 62 citations
  2. 2Human well-being : concept and measurement2007 · 87 citations
  3. 3Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators2005 · 2,651 citations
  4. 4Satisfaction and comparison income1996 · 3,013 citations
  5. 5Demanding work: the paradox of job quality in the affluent economy2006 · 809 citations