PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1998Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology132 citationsOpen Access

Sex and Topographic Differences in Associations Between Large-Artery Wall Thickness and Coronary Risk Profile in a French Working Cohort

View Full Paper
JGJérôme GariépyJSJean A. SalomonNDNicolas Denarié

Structured PICO

P
Population
788 individuals (326 men and 462 women), aged 17 to 65 years, from a French working cohort.
O
Outcome
Association between carotid and femoral intima-media thickness (IMT) and multifactorial coronary risk (Framingham risk) and individual risk factorssurrogate

Carotid IMT in men is a stronger indicator of multifactorial coronary risk burden compared to women or femoral IMT in both sexes, highlighting sex and topographic differences in arterial remodeling.

Abstract

Previous reports have investigated associations between carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and cardiovascular risk factors. Our objective was to investigate this question in greater depth by measuring both femoral and carotid IMT in relation to sex and multifactorial coronary risk. We investigated carotid and femoral artery IMT by using ultrasonography in 326 men and 462 women, 17 to 65 years old. We also evaluated body mass index, blood pressure, blood lipids, glucose, smoking, and Framingham coronary risk. In both vessels, IMT was lower in women than in men. Significant relations between carotid and femoral IMT existed with age and most risk factors in both sexes. After adjustment for age, carotid IMT was related to risk factors in both sexes except for diastolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol, and smoking in women, whereas femoral IMT was related to triglycerides and smoking in both sexes, systolic blood pressure and blood glucose in men, and total and HDL cholesterol in women. Significant unadjusted and age-adjusted relations of Framingham risk existed with carotid and femoral IMT in both sexes, but slopes of these relations were greater (1) before than after age adjustment, (2) in men than in women at both sites, except the femoral artery after age adjustment, and (3) at the carotid than at the femoral site in both sexes before age adjustment. Carotid IMT in men appears to be a more powerful predictor than it is in women and femoral IMT in both sexes in reflecting multifactorial coronary risk burden, but these differences are partly conditional on age.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gariépy et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17d9a9cf02a40e68b43fb3https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.18.4.584
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Factors of Carotid Arterial Enlargement in a Population Aged 59 to 71 Years1996 · 154 citations
  2. 2Thickening of the Carotid Wall1996 · 384 citations
  3. 3Relation of carotid artery wall thickness to diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose and insulin, body size, and physical activity. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators.1994 · 451 citations
  4. 4Insulin Resistance as an Independent Risk Factor for Carotid Wall Thickening1996 · 104 citations
  5. 5Isolated systolic hypertension and vessel wall thickness of the carotid artery. The Rotterdam Elderly Study.1993 · 172 citations