PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 2026Carbohydrate Polymers0 citationsOpen Access

A combined mechanical grinding-deep eutectic solvent strategy for the deconstruction of carbohydrates-rich fruit by-products

View Full Paper
LPLucie PerretCACarole Antoine-AssorJBJohnny Beaugrand

Key Points

  • This study aims to improve carbohydrate recovery from fruit by-products using a combination of grinding and natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES).
  • Utilized vibratory ball grinding with chloride-based NADES (lactic acid, malic acid, malonic acid) on lemon peel and apple pomace.
  • Analyzed mass yields and compositional changes after treatment with NADES.
  • Evaluated the effects of particle-size reduction and solvent interactions on extraction efficiency.
  • Combination of grinding with lactic acid and malic acid NADES increased mass yields up to 9.0%.
  • CCMnic showed lower efficiency with maximum yields of 4.3%.
  • Co-extraction of polysaccharides and lignin was observed, ranging from 3.0% to 15% depending on treatment.

Abstract

The efficient recovery of carbohydrates from fruit by-products is limited by their restricted accessibility, as they are embedded within the complex cell wall matrix. Overcoming this barrier requires particle-size reduction, matrix disruption and selection of appropriate solvent. Recently, natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES) have emerged as promising sustainable alternative for polysaccharide recovery. However, their high viscosity can hinder mass transfer and consequently extraction yield. This study investigates the combination of NADES with grinding to enhance cell wall carbohydrates accessibility in lemon peel and apple pomace. Vibratory ball grinding was performed in presence of three chloride-based NADES: lactic acid (CCLA), malic acid (CCMlic), and malonic acid (CCMnic). Combining grinding with CCLA and CCMlic significantly increased mass yields, up to four-fold, reaching a maximum of 9.0%. This increase was associated to increased surface area and mechanical energy input by impact, as supported by modelling. In contrast, CCMnic showed limited efficiency with yields up to 4.3%, likely due to weaker solvent-matrix interactions. Compositional analyses revealed the co -extraction of polysaccharides with other components, including lignin (3.0 to 15%). Additionally, the initial disruption degree of the fruit by-product was identified as a critical factor for polysaccharides recovery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Perret et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17daca3fad632b0f9d7ba2https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2026.125489
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The middle lamella—more than a glue2017 · 138 citations
  2. 2Natural Deep Eutectic Solvent-Assisted Pectin Extraction from Pomelo Peel Using Sonoreactor: Experimental Optimization Approach2019 · 58 citations