PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 2026Pediatric Dermatology0 citations

An Evaluation of Pediatric Dermatology Fellowship Websites: Content Analysis and Perspectives of Fellows and Program Directors

View Full Paper
CHCathleen HuangMayo Clinic in ArizonaVIVivian C. IloabuchiMayo Clinic in ArizonaJBJacob BreinholtMayo Clinic in Arizona

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the content of pediatric dermatology fellowship websites and identify areas for enhancement based on stakeholder perspectives.
  • Evaluated 29 pediatric dermatology fellowship websites using 27 criteria across four domains.
  • Conducted electronic surveys targeting current pediatric dermatology fellows and program directors.
  • Used the Society for Pediatric Dermatology's fellowship listing as the sample reference.
  • 29 fellowship websites had varying educational criteria (47.8%), recruitment criteria (46.0%), social criteria (30.7%), and other criteria (31.6%) included.
  • Fellows rated several website components as significantly more valuable than program directors.
  • Findings indicate incomplete website content and differing expectations between fellows and PDs.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Prospective applicants for pediatric dermatology fellowships often use program websites as a source of information. This study evaluated the content of pediatric dermatology fellowship websites to identify potential areas of improvement including website accessibility and information found on websites. In addition, this study also surveyed current pediatric dermatology fellows and program directors (PDs) to determine priorities in website content across different stakeholders. METHODS: Using the Society for Pediatric Dermatology's (SPD) list of fellowship programs, two independent evaluators assessed the same 40 total programs, with 29 of the same websites included for analysis, against 27 criteria across four domains. In addition, an electronic survey was disseminated via the SPD's mailing list to current pediatric dermatology fellows and fellowship PDs. RESULTS: On average between both evaluators, of the 29 included fellowship websites, 9 educational criteria were included 47.8% of the time across the websites, compared to 46.0% of 10 recruitment criteria, 30.7% of 5 social criteria, and 31.6% of 3 other criteria. Fellows were significantly more likely than PDs to consider several website components as highly valuable. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal variable and incomplete content across pediatric dermatology fellowship websites, as well as differing expectations for fellowship websites between pediatric dermatology fellowship applicants and PDs, which may help provide suggestions to optimize future website development to enhance applicant engagement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17dcdf3fad632b0f9d98f0https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.70271
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper