PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Creating Synergy between Indigenous Knowledge Systems and National Case Management in Zimbabwe: A Social Work Perspective

View Full Paper
BTBenjamin TungwaLMLivingson MoyoDMDaniel Masungwa

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how Indigenous Knowledge Systems can improve Zimbabwe's National Case Management System for child welfare.
  • Adopted an exploratory phenomenological design
  • Conducted in-depth interviews and focus group discussions
  • Employed purposive sampling in Rushinga district
  • Identified critical gaps in community awareness and engagement with NCMS
  • Revealed persistent cultural practices perpetuating child rights violations
  • Recommended capacity-building initiatives and stronger community participation

Abstract

This study interrogates the socio-cultural dimensions underpinning the efficacy of Zimbabwe's National Case Management System (NCMS) for child welfare, foregrounding the imperative integration of African Indigenous Knowledge Systems (AIKS) to enhance programmatic responsiveness within rural communities. Grounded in the Ubuntu philosophy, which posits communal responsibility and relational humanism as foundational to child-rearing and welfare, the research adopts an interpretivist paradigm to elucidate the complex interplay between indigenous cultural frameworks and formal child protection mechanisms. Employing an exploratory phenomenological design, qualitative data were harvested through purposive sampling involving in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and key informant interviews within Rushinga district, a rural locale beset by socio-economic vulnerabilities and entrenched traditional practices. Thematic analysis unveiled critical gaps in community awareness, engagement, and involvement in NCMS implementation, alongside persistent cultural practices that inadvertently perpetuate child rights violations such as early marriages and child labour. Findings underscore the exigency for deliberate advocacy, robust community participation, and strategic incorporation of indigenous epistemologies within policy and practice to reconcile tensions between modern child welfare protocols and local sociocultural realities. The study recommends institutionalising community-centred dialogues, capacity-building initiatives for indigenous knowledge documentation, and elevating traditional leadership roles in program governance to foster culturally consonant, sustainable child protection outcomes. Ultimately, this research contributes to the discourse on decolonising social welfare systems by advocating for a culturally grounded, participatory approach that respects and harnesses indigenous knowledge as a transformative conduit for strengthening child welfare frameworks in Zimbabwe

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tungwa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17dd4e3fad632b0f9da0b8https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20399505
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper