PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Tail-Risk Controlled Multi-Agent Resource Allocation for Hybrid Clouds

View Full Paper
NBNarender BitlaBKBikesh KumarMDMurali Shankar Dulam

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a resource allocation architecture that minimizes tail risks in hybrid-cloud environments.
  • Proposed TCRA architecture incorporating demand, placement, policy, carbon, and verification agents.
  • Used conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) budgeting for decision-making.
  • Simulated evaluation across four hybrid-cloud workload families.
  • Reduced the CVaR of composite service loss by 39.8% compared to mean optimization, P<0.001.
  • Decreased P99 deadline violations from 4.8% to 1.7%, with statistical significance.
  • Achieved 8.6% less carbon exposure compared to traditional latency-first allocation.

Abstract

Hybrid-cloud agentic applications allocate retrieval, inference, forecasting, and operational analytics across private clusters and public providers whose delay, price, carbon exposure, capacity, and policy eligibility vary over time. Optimizing mean cost or mean latency alone can hide rare but consequential deadline misses, unsupported recommendation routes, privacy-boundary violations, and demand forecast failures. This paper proposes TCRA, a Tail-Risk Controlled Resource Allocation architecture in which demand, placement, policy, carbon, and verification agents jointly construct feasible workload routes under conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) budgets. TCRA combines contract-typed actions, API-mesh telemetry, distributional loss estimates, long-horizon demand forecasts, and an immutable decision ledger. A simulated evaluation over four hybrid-cloud workload families reports that TCRA reduces the CVaR of composite service loss by 39.8% relative to policy-constrained mean optimization, reduces P99 deadline violations from 4.8% to 1.7%, and preserves zero simulated policy-invalid placements while using 8.6% less carbon exposure than latency-first allocation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bitla et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17ddab3fad632b0f9da5dfhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20391318
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper