PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2008Journal of Neurophysiology138 citationsOpen Access

Endpoint Force Fluctuations Reveal Flexible Rather Than Synergistic Patterns of Muscle Cooperation

View Full Paper
JKJason J. KutchAKArthur D. KuoABAnthony M. Bloch

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We developed a new approach to investigate how the nervous system activates multiple redundant muscles by studying the endpoint force fluctuations during isometric force generation at a multi-degree-of-freedom joint. We hypothesized that, due to signal-dependent muscle force noise, endpoint force fluctuations would depend on the target direction of index finger force and that this dependence could be used to distinguish flexible from synergistic activation of the musculature. We made high-gain measurements of isometric forces generated to different target magnitudes and directions, in the plane of index finger metacarpophalangeal joint abduction-adduction/flexion-extension. Force fluctuations from each target were used to calculate a covariance ellipse, the shape of which varied as a function of target direction. Directions with narrow ellipses were approximately aligned with the estimated mechanical actions of key muscles. For example, targets directed along the mechanical action of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) yielded narrow ellipses, with 88% of the variance directed along those target directions. It follows the FDI is likely a prime mover in this target direction and that, at most, 12% of the force variance could be explained by synergistic coupling with other muscles. In contrast, other target directions exhibited broader covariance ellipses with as little as 30% of force variance directed along those target directions. This is the result of cooperation among multiple muscles, based on independent electromyographic recordings. However, the pattern of cooperation across target directions indicates that muscles are recruited flexibly in accordance with their mechanical action, rather than in fixed groupings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kutch et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17e31aa0e670aec86eddd1https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.90274.2008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Tendon excursion and moment arm of index finger muscles1983 · 384 citations
  2. 2Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseous muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man.1993 · 188 citations
  3. 3Classics in Movement Science2001 · 24 citations
  4. 4Analysis of the effects of firing rate and synchronization on spike-triggered averaging of multidirectional motor unit torque2007 · 14 citations
  5. 5Muscle synergies during locomotion in the cat: a model for motor cortex control2008 · 171 citations