PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2002Journal of Climate11 citations

Evaluation of the Effect of the Luers–Eskridge Radiation Adjustments on Radiosonde Temperature Homogeneity

View Full Paper
IDImke DurreTPThomas C. PetersonRVRussell S. Vose

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The effect of the Luers–Eskridge adjustments on the homogeneity of archived radiosonde temperature observations is evaluated. Using unadjusted and adjusted radiosonde data from the Comprehensive Aerological Reference Dataset (CARDS) as well as microwave sounding unit (MSU) version-d monthly temperature anomalies, the discontinuities in differences between radiosonde and MSU temperature anomalies across times of documented changes in radiosonde are computed for the lower to midtroposphere, mid- to upper troposphere, and lower stratosphere. For this purpose, a discontinuity is defined as a statistically significant difference between means of radiosonde–MSU differences for the 30-month periods immediately prior to and following a documented change in radiosonde type. The magnitude and number of discontinuities based on unadjusted and adjusted radiosonde data are then compared. Since the Luers–Eskridge adjustments have been designed to remove radiation and lag errors from radiosonde temperature measurements, the homogeneity of the data should improve whenever these types of errors dominate. It is found that even though stratospheric radiosonde temperatures appear to be somewhat more homogeneous after the Luers–Eskridge adjustments have been applied, transition-related discontinuities in the troposphere are frequently amplified by the adjustments. Significant discontinuities remain in the adjusted data in all three atmospheric layers. Based on the findings of this study, it appears that the Luers–Eskridge adjustments do not render upper-air temperature records sufficiently homogeneous for climate change analyses. Given that the method was designed to adjust only for radiation and lag errors in radiosonde temperature measurements, its relative ineffectiveness at producing homogeneous time series is likely to be caused by 1) an inaccurate calculation of the radiation or lag errors and/or 2) the presence of other errors in the data that contribute significantly to observed discontinuities in the time series.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Durre et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17ec5ccf49e78c48b49b33https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<1335:eoteot>2.0.co;2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Precision and Radiosonde Validation of Satellite Gridpoint Temperature Anomalies. Part II: A Tropospheric Retrieval and Trends during 1979–901992 · 163 citations
  2. 2Temperature Corrections for the VIZ and Vaisala Radiosondes1995 · 76 citations
  3. 3Determination of Cloud Amount and Level from Radiosonde Soundings1996 · 95 citations
  4. 4REDUCTION OF DIURNAL VARIATION IN THE REPORTED TEMPERATURES AND HEIGHTS OF STRATOSPHERIC CONSTANT-PRESSURE SURFACES1960 · 28 citations
  5. 5Complex quality control of upper-air variables (geopotential height, temperature, wind, and humidity) at mandatory and significant levels for the cards data set. Final report1996 · 11 citations