PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2006European Journal of International Relations287 citations

Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society

View Full Paper
JDJack Donnelly

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

How is unrivalled American power reshaping 21st-century international society? Is the United States an empire, in fact or in the making? This article attempts to elaborate the conceptual resources required to answer such questions. I focus on multiple forms of hierarchy in anarchy and diverse practices of sovereign inequality—concepts that most mainstream perspectives ignore, find paradoxical, or even dismiss as self-contradictory. After defining empire and hierarchy in anarchy, I present a typology of international orders tuned to thinking about empire and its alternatives. The central section of the article explores three classes of formal inequalities common during the Westphalian era—special rights of Great Powers, restricted rights for outlaws, and a wide range of particular practices of ‘semi-sovereignty’. I then sketch ten historically grounded models of hierarchical international relations. Two brief applications to contemporary American power seek to illustrate the value of this conceptual apparatus. Throughout, my focus is on appreciating the precise nature and considerable variety of international inequalities. I argue that the concepts of hierarchy in anarchy and sovereign inequality, but not empire, are essential for understanding the shape and development of contemporary international order.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jack Donnelly (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17ee1f3aabde875b131bechttps://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106064505
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Savagery in democracy's empire2005 · 49 citations
  2. 2International Law and Totalitarian Lawlessness1944 · 25 citations
  3. 3The Equality of States in International Law1921 · 29 citations
  4. 4A Treatise on International Law1925 · 278 citations
  5. 5Sovereignty and Inequality1998 · 240 citations