PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 22, 2021Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences4 citationsOpen Access

Potential Drug Interactions in Adults Living in Manaus: A Real-World Comparison of Two Databases, 2019

TBTayanny Margarida Menezes Almeida BiaseGBGiulia Sartori BRUNIÉRIMSMarcus Tolentino Silva

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Objectives: Drug information systems are commonly used by professionals to assist in the identification of drug interactions and to ensure the safe use of medications. Real-world evidence about the comparison of different drug interaction sources is scarce. We aimed to compare two drug interaction databases to identify interactions in a population-based survey. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study based on a previous survey performed in the city of Manaus, Brazil, in 2019. We included adults aged 18 years and over, who used two or more medicines 15 days before the interview. To assess potential drug interactions, we searched Micromedex and UpToDate databases. The primary outcome was the prevalence of potential drug interactions in each database. Weighted Kappa statistics were calculated to assess agreement on the presence of drug interaction, documentation and severity. Results: A total of 752 participants were included in the study. The prevalence of drug interactions was 43.8% 95% confidence interval (CI): 40.2, 47.3% in UpToDate and 30.2% (95% CI: 26.9, 33.5%), in Micromedex. The agreement related to drug interactions between the two databases was fair (Kappa: 0.631). For severity (Kappa: 0.398) and documentation (Kappa: 0.311), the agreement was poor. Conclusion: Agreement among compared databases was sub-optimal. Better quality and transparency of evidence available in drug interaction sources are needed to support informed healthcare professionals' decision.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Biase et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a183ef7cf49e78c48b4f85fhttps://doi.org/10.4274/tjps.galenos.2021.96603
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Common Method Bias: A Full Collinearity Assessment Method for PLS-SEM2017 · 748 citations
  2. 2Competitive factors of electronic dance music festivals with Social Networking Service (SNS) citizenship behaviour of international tourists2018 · 11 citations
  3. 3A Cross-National Investigation into the Individual and National Cultural Antecedents of Consumer Innovativeness1999 · 1,040 citations
  4. 4What keeps the mobile hotel booking users loyal? Investigating the roles of self-efficacy, compatibility, perceived ease of use, and perceived convenience2016 · 468 citations
  5. 5Antecedents of revisit intention2006 · 790 citations