PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1993University of Pennsylvania Law Review75 citations

The Theory, History, and Practice of the Bribery-Extortion Distinction

View Full Paper
JLJames Lindgren

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In the law of blackmail and extortion, two topics have generated great debates: the paradox of blackmail and the bribery-extortion distinction.The paradox debate has so far been more theoretical than practical or historical, while the bribery-extortion debate has been more practical and historical than theoretical.In this Article, I will first examine the theoretical overlap of bribery and extortion.Next, I will try to tie together the paradox debate and the briberyextortion debate.As I see it, the same principle that underlies bribery underlies public official extortion and blackmail.That is part of what has made extortion and bribery so difficult to distinguish.Then I will analyze the recent Supreme Court jurisprudence of extortion and answer some of the historical questions raised by the sharp exchange between Justices Stevens and Thomas over my work.I.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

James Lindgren (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a18689f36f65e9da61ec94chttps://doi.org/10.2307/3312572
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper