PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 14, 2012The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters382 citations

An Extended Charge Equilibration Method

View Full Paper
CWChristopher E. WilmerKKKi Chul KimRSRandall Q. Snurr

Key Points

  • To develop a computationally efficient charge equilibration method that accurately estimates partial atomic charges across periodic porous frameworks using full ionization energy series.
  • Extended the standard charge equilibration (Qeq) approach by incorporating full periodic ionization energy data and reducing empirical inputs to two global parameters.
  • Computed periodic electrostatic interactions using Ewald summation and solved partial charges directly through a non-iterative system of linear equations.
  • Benchmarked EQeq predictions across 12 diverse metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) against plane-wave density-functional theory (REPEAT), ChelpG, and standard Qeq methods.
  • EQeq matched the accuracy of electrostatic potential-derived charges when ranking MOFs for carbon capture applications.
  • Reduced calculation time from days required by density functional theory methods to mere seconds per framework.

Abstract

We present a method for estimating partial atomic charges that uses all of the measured ionization energies (first, second, third, etc.) for every atom in the periodic table. We build on the charge equilibration (Qeq) method of Rappé and Goddard (which used only the first ionization energies) but reduce the number of ad hoc parameters from at least one for every type of atom to just two global parameters: a dielectric strength and a modified parameter for hydrogen atoms. Periodic electrostatic interactions are calculated via Ewald sums, and the partial charges are determined by simultaneously solving a system of linear equations; no iteration is required. We compare the predicted partial atomic charges of this extended charge equilibration (EQeq) scheme against plane-wave density-functional theory derived charges determined via the REPEAT method for 12 diverse metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). We also compare EQeq charges against ChelpG charges calculated using nonperiodic MOF fragments, as well as against Qeq charges as implemented in Accelrys Materials Studio. We demonstrate that for the purpose of ranking MOFs from best to worst for carbon capture applications, EQeq charges perform as well as charges derived from electrostatic potentials, but EQeq requires only a tiny fraction of the computational cost (seconds vs days for the MOFs studied). The source code for the EQeq algorithm is provided.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wilmer et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a188c9e3ad5dee7381eefebhttps://doi.org/10.1021/jz3008485
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper