PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 8, 2017The International Journal of Human Resource Management214 citationsOpen Access

Personality, self-efficacy and job resources and their associations with employee engagement, affective commitment and turnover intentions

View Full Paper
SASimon L. AlbrechtAMAndrew Marty

Key Points

  • This paper investigates how personality traits and job resources impact employee engagement, affective commitment, and turnover intentions.
  • Analyzed data from 623 participants across various organizations using structural equation modelling.
  • Examined HEXACO personality facets, self-efficacy, and job resources in relation to engagement outcomes.
  • Model explained 69% of variance in engagement (effect p<0.001).
  • Model explained 60% of variance in affective commitment (effect p<0.001).
  • Model explained 33% of variance in turnover intention (effect p<0.001).

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the extent to which personality characteristics influence employees’ psychological connection to their work beyond that predicted by job context factors. More specifically, using Job Demands-Resources theory, we examined the influence of HEXACO personality facets, self-efficacy, and job resources on engagement, affective commitment and turnover intention. We used structural equation modelling on data collected from 623 participants working in a variety of organizational settings to test a proposed and a re-specified model. The results showed that both job resources and individual differences factors had direct and indirect effects on engagement, affective commitment and turnover intention. The personality facet liveliness was positively associated with engagement; sentimentality was positively associated with affective commitment; and social boldness, diligence and sentimentality were positively associated with self-efficacy. The model explained 69% of the variance in engagement, 60% of the variance in affective commitment and 33% of the variance in turnover intention. Despite the stronger influence of job resources, the results suggest that both individual factors and job context factors influence employees’ psychological attachment to their work. Practical implications in terms of selection, engagement and organizational development interventions, and further research opportunities are identified.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Albrecht et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a189b149b18e8e1efcf8498https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1362660
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper