PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026Competition and Regulation in Network Industries0 citations

“We Did Not Vote to Pay to Drive”: Willingness to Pay and Implications for Public-Private Partnerships for Roads in Uganda and South Africa

View Full Paper
ANAlex NduhuraMLMuhiya Tshombe LukambaITIvan K. Twinomuhwezi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of willingness to pay (WTP) for Public–Private Partnership (PPP) toll roads in Uganda and South Africa, drawing on qualitative evidence from road users and policy makers. The findings show that WTP is shaped by a combination of socio-economic, institutional, and service-related factors. In South Africa, WTP is influenced by welfare expectations, social norms, and perceptions of fairness, while in Uganda, it is primarily driven by direct economic benefits such as affordability, travel time savings, and road quality. Across both contexts, affordability and time utility emerge as universal drivers, alongside service quality, safety, and reliability. In relation to the New Public Management framework, the findings suggest that market-oriented, user-pay models are effective only when supported by strong accountability, transparency, and service performance, reinforcing the need to balance efficiency with social legitimacy in public service delivery. The study further establishes that governance credibility, transparency, and trust mediate user acceptance. The main contribution of this paper is to demonstrate that WTP in African PPPs reflects the interaction of economic utility, welfare traditions, and institutional legitimacy — underscoring the need for context-sensitive PPP design rather than uniform user-pay models. In practice, the findings highlight the importance of affordable, transparent pricing, regulatory oversight, and sustained investment in road quality, safety, and maintenance. Socially, the study emphasizes the need for equity, inclusivity, and the provision of alternative routes to enhance public acceptance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nduhura et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a18a25ee0375f9dbfcf91a4https://doi.org/10.1177/17835917261455913
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Influence of Relational Norms on User Interests in PPP Projects: Mediating Effect of Project Performance2018 · 16 citations
  2. 2Understanding pitfalls in the application of PPPs in transport infrastructure in Portugal2015 · 53 citations
  3. 3THE DRIVING FACTORS OF CHINA'S PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS IN METROPOLITIAN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: PUBLIC SECTOR'S VIEWPOINT2010 · 73 citations
  4. 4How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis2016 · 4,697 citations
  5. 5Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool2018 · 240 citations