PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1992Journal of Clinical Investigation97 citationsOpen Access

Hydrogen ion concentration is not the sole determinant of muscle metaboreceptor responses in humans.

LSLawrence I. SinowayRRRobert F. ReaTMTimothy J. Mosher

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how exercise conditioning influences muscle sympathetic nerve activity and whether hydrogen ion concentration is the sole determinant.
  • Examined MSNA during static handgrip and posthandgrip circulatory arrest across forearm dominance and bodybuilding groups.

Structured PICO

Does exercise conditioning (forearm dominance and bodybuilding) reduce muscle sympathetic nerve activity during handgrip and post-handgrip circulatory arrest in healthy volunteers?

P
Population
11 normal volunteers (mean age 24 yr) and 7 bodybuilders (mean age 27 yr) for peroneal nerve studies; 8 normal volunteers and 8 bodybuilders for NMR experiments.
I
Intervention
Exercise conditioning (forearm dominance and bodybuilding) during static handgrip and post-handgrip circulatory arrest (PHG-CA).
C
Comparator
Nondominant forearm and normal volunteers (untrained controls).
O
Outcome
Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and forearm muscle pH during handgrip and post-handgrip circulatory arrest.surrogate

Exercise conditioning attenuates muscle sympathetic nerve activity responses during exercise through mechanisms beyond just a reduction in muscle acidosis.

Abstract

We examined the effects of exercise conditioning on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) during handgrip and posthandgrip circulatory arrest (PHG-CA). Two conditioning stimuli were studied: forearm dominance and bodybuilding. Static handgrip at 30% maximal voluntary contraction followed by PHG-CA led to a rise in MSNA smaller in dominant than in nondominant forearms (99% vs. 222%; P less than 0.02) and in body builders than in normal volunteers (28% vs. 244%; P less than 0.01). Separate 31P NMR experiments showed no effect of dominance on forearm pH but a pH in bodybuilders higher (6.88) than in normal volunteers (6.79; P less than 0.02) during PHG-CA. Our second goal was to determine if factors besides attenuated H+ contribute to this conditioning effect. If differences in MSNA during exercise were noted at the same pH, then other mechanisms must contribute to the training effect. We measured MSNA during ischemic fatiguing handgrip. No dominance or bodybuilding effect on pH was noted. However, we noted increases in MSNA smaller in dominant than nondominant forearms (212% vs. 322%; P less than 0.02) and in bodybuilders than in normal volunteers (161% vs. 334%; P less than 0.01). In summary, MSNA responses were less during exercise of conditioned limbs. Factors aside from a lessening of muscle acidosis contribute to this effect.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sinoway et al. (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a18da7da09e0bfd307c11f2https://doi.org/10.1172/jci115792
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper