PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2001Psychophysiology239 citations

Constraints for emotion specificity in fear and anger: The context counts

View Full Paper
GSGerhard StemmlerMHMarcus HeldmannCPCornelia A. Pauls

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We investigated psychophysiological responses to fear and anger inductions during real-life and imagination. Female participants (N = 158) were assigned to a fear-treatment, fear-control, anger-treatment, or anger-control group. Context (real-life, imagination) was varied in two sessions of fixed order. Eleven self-report and 29 somatovisceral variables were registered. Results showed that (a) except during anger imagination, control groups were emotionless; (b) in control groups, contexts prompted diverging somatovisceral responses, but similar emotion self-reports; except during fear imagination, the emotion inductions (c) were successful and (d) produced specific emotion reports; (e) during real-life, somatovisceral fear and anger responses exhibited a marked cardiovascular defense reflex; (f) in addition, real-life fear showed an adrenaline-like specific response pattern, whereas real-life anger showed specific forehead temperature and EMG extensor increases, accompanied by an elevated DBP during imagination. A Component Model of Somatovisceral Response Organization is proposed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stemmler et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a18f1fb0b0ae5b64a91f73ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3820275
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper