Climate Migration

ABSTRACT Climate migration raises difficult normative challenges for political philosophy. Existing scholarship largely applies theories of international rights and distributive justice to climate‐induced mobility, focusing on refugee status and how the international community should allocate responsibility. We argue that although these approaches answer many important questions, they are also limited by their reliance on the constitutive norms of the current state‐based international order. After reviewing rights‐based frameworks, we highlight emerging debates that question how climate migration disrupts foundational ideals of territorial sovereignty and national self‐determination. These debates underscore the need for normative analysis attentive to power hierarchies, cultural loss, and community‐led adaptation practices. We conclude by discussing methodological innovations through “engaged” or “grounded” theorizing, which incorporates the perspectives of affected communities and addresses fragmented arenas of practice. This approach aims to guide more context‐sensitive normative responses to climate migration.