PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies0 citationsOpen Access

Scale-dependent hydrological controls on storm runoff volume and its turbidity in nested catchments of the Eastern Italian Alps

View Full Paper
KKKenta KoyanagiAAAndrea AndreoliGNGiovanna Nordio

Key Points

  • This research investigates how storm runoff and turbidity vary with catchment scale in the Eastern Italian Alps.
  • Monitored runoff volume and turbidity across four spatial scales in a nested catchment.
  • Assessed 23–41 rainfall events from April to October 2024.
  • Analyzed the relationship between runoff coefficients and drainage area.
  • Storm runoff coefficients showed a negative power-law scaling with drainage area (exponent: -1/10).
  • Average runoff coefficients for larger catchments (42.4 and 166 km²) were both 0.01.
  • Turbidity in the larger catchment was more variable and less sensitive to rainfall intensity and duration.

Abstract

Study Region We developed a new experimental nested catchment in the Eggen-Ega River basin, Eastern Italian Alps, comprising four 27 m 2 hillslope plots and three watersheds draining 2.34, 42.4, and 166 km 2 . Study Focus We aimed to understand scale-dependent magnitude and controls of turbid stormflow transfer across the Alpine catchments. We monitored runoff volume and turbidity at four spatial scales and assessed their dependence on the characteristics of 23–41 rainfall events between April and October 2024. New Hydrological Insights for the Region Storm runoff coefficients exhibited a negative power-law scaling with drainage area (exponent: −1/10), suggesting stronger scale-dependent runoff fluctuations at finer scales, critically limiting the representativeness of small-scale, single-point stream gauging in the region. On the contrary, the mean runoff coefficients at 42.4 and 166 km 2 were both 0.01, suggesting sufficient region-specific drainage sizes to average out the uniqueness of monitoring locations and timing. While rainfall intensity and saturation (event depth and duration) exerted primary controls on event-scale sediment delivery from 27 m 2 plots to a 2.34 km 2 headwater, turbidity in the larger 42.4 km 2 catchment was more variable and less sensitive to rainfall predictors, likely due to sediment routing beyond the timescale of individual storm events. Our novel nested catchment approach highlights scale-dependent observations of turbid stormflow, calling for extended monitoring of nested catchments across the Alpine regions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koyanagi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192cd5fab5b468c4415a0chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.103569
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper