PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Environmental Science & Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Differential Effects of Zooplankton on Sunlight Inactivation of Viruses

MVMartha I. Verbel-OlarteTKTamar KohnNINiveen S. Ismail

Key Points

  • This research investigates how filter-feeding zooplankton influence viral persistence in surface waters during sunlight and dark conditions.
  • Evaluated virus removal in dark and sunlight conditions using bacteriophage MS2 and echovirus11 with Tetrahymena pyriformis and Brachionus calyciflorus.
  • Conducted experiments to measure decay rates and virus removal efficacy under controlled conditions.
  • Compared organism-dependent removal rates of viruses across different light settings.
  • Rotifers showed greater virus removal than ciliates in dark conditions.
  • Under sunlight, ciliates enhanced virus removal more effectively than rotifers, achieving up to 4.2 log removal of MS2 in 58 hours.
  • Decay rate constants indicated species-dependent variations in viral inactivation, demonstrating the interplay between light and zooplankton type.

Abstract

Interactions between viruses and filter-feeding zooplankton can alter viral persistence in surface waters, with direct implications for water quality and public health risk. However, data on virus-zooplankton interactions and the environmental factors that influence them are still limited. This study evaluated the impact of filter feeding, in the dark and under simulated sunlight, on a bacteriophage (MS2) and a human virus (echovirus11; E11) in the presence of a ciliate (Tetrahymena pyriformis) and rotifer (Brachionus calyciflorus). Dark experiments established organism-dependent baseline removal for each virus, and rotifers showed greater removal of both viruses in comparison to ciliates. Under simulated sunlight, in contrast, experiments with ciliates resulted in greater virus removal compared to experiments with rotifers over a similar timespan (4.2 vs 2.7 log MS2 in 53–58 h; 3.5 vs 3.0 log E11 in 24–25 h). Analysis of decay rate constants reveals species-specific shifts in virus removal between dark and light that, depending on viral type and zooplankton species, either accelerate viral attenuation or protect viruses and prolong infectivity. T. pyriformis increases removal under sunlight relative to dark conditions and acts synergistically with sunlight inactivation, whereas rotifers impede sunlight inactivation. These data address important knowledge gaps on how dark biotic processes can modulate sunlight-mediated inactivation. The reported decay constants can help inform predictions of virus environmental fate with implications for natural and engineered treatment systems that rely on sunlight disinfection to inactivate viruses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Verbel-Olarte et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192cd5fab5b468c4415a1ehttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c03486
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper