PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Social Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Extended Foster Care Practice and Program Reform: Perspectives of Workers and Community Partners

View Full Paper
ETEmiko A. TajimaKJKristian JonesJTJon M. Torres

Key Points

  • This research aims to identify barriers and necessary reforms in the extended foster care system for young adults.
  • Conducted qualitative focus groups with 24 workers and interviews with 14 community practitioners in Washington state.
  • Utilized rapid qualitative analysis and thematic analysis to analyze coded content from transcripts.
  • Identified key themes related to service gaps, organizational reforms, and cultural responsiveness.
  • Identified significant service and benefit gaps affecting young adults transitioning from foster care.
  • Emphasized the need for organizational practice reforms, including EFC-specific units and tailored training.
  • Highlighted the necessity for a representative workforce and evidence-based practices in the EFC system.

Abstract

Extended Foster Care (EFC) provides services and benefits on a voluntary basis to young adults leaving the foster care system without having attained legal permanency. In the US, more than 19,000 young adults transitioned out of foster care without achieving legal permanency in 2021. As states seek to improve supports to young adults eligible for EFC, it is important to identify institutional barriers and needed practice reforms. This study reports on analyses of qualitative focus group data gathered from workers (N = 24) and interviews with community practitioners (N = 14) as part of Washington state’s collaborative systems assessment of EFC. Data from transcripts were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis of coded content. Rapid qualitative analysis allowed for efficient analysis and sorting of data to gather findings prior to the legislative session. Key themes identified related to (1) service and benefit gaps and needs, (2) organizational practice reforms, and (3) a need for culturally responsive services and a representative workforce. Specifically, workforce staff and community partners emphasized the need for EFC-specific units, developmentally tailored training, working from a clearly articulated practice model relevant to youth and young adults, the importance of reducing caseloads, recruitment and retention of a representative workforce, and more evidence-based practice options for EFC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tajima et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192d2efab5b468c44160f2https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15060347
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper