PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

HPV-stratified tissue factor expression and multi-omic correlates of overall survival after tisotumab vedotin in cervical cancer.

View Full Paper
SBShaina BruceSWSharon WuWGWen Gu

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate how HPV status influences tissue factor expression and overall survival in cervical cancer patients treated with tisotumab vedotin.
  • Included 274 cervical cancer patients treated with tisotumab vedotin, stratified by HPV status (HPV+, HPV-).
  • Performed DNA and RNA sequencing to determine HPV status and analyze transcriptomic data.
  • Calculated overall survival from treatment initiation to death or last follow-up, using Cox proportional hazards for hazard ratios.
  • In HPV- patients, high tissue factor expression significantly improved overall survival (median OS 21.81 vs 9.79 months; HR 0.251, 95% CI 0.065–0.977; log-rank p=0.032).
  • No significant overall survival difference was observed in the HPV+ cohort with different tissue factor expression levels (median OS 10.22 vs 10.35 months; HR 0.602, log-rank p=0.138).
  • Transcriptomic analysis indicated differing biological pathways related to survival based on HPV status.

Abstract

5537 Background: Cervical cancer (CxC) is heterogeneous, and the impact of HPV status on outcomes with tisotumab vedotin (TV; tissue factor TF/F3–targeted ADC) remains incompletely defined. We evaluated HPV-stratified associations between TF expression and real-world overall survival (OS) after TV and explored molecular correlates of long vs short survival. Methods: 274 CxC patients who received TV (HPV+, n=106; HPV-, n=45) underwent DNA and RNA sequencing. HPV16/18/31/33/45 status was determined from whole exome sequencing (WES). Real-world OS was calculated from first TV claim to death/last contact. Hazard ratio (HR) was estimated by Cox proportional hazards, with p-value using log-rank test. TFH was defined as TF (F3) expression (RNA-seq normalized expression) ≥ the cohort-specific median (median split) among TV-treated cases with available data. For transcriptomic comparisons, LS (long survival) and SS (short survival) were defined as above-median vs below-median OS after TV within each HPV stratum, respectively. Results: Among TV-treated patients with available TF/OS data, TFH vs TFL showed no statistically significant OS difference in the overall cohort (n=195; TFH n=98 vs TFL n=97; median OS 11.73 vs 9.79 months; HR 0.765; log-rank p=0.142) or in the HPV+ cohort (n=69; TFH n=35 vs TFL n=34; median OS 10.22 vs 10.35 months; HR 0.602; log-rank p=0.138). In contrast, in the HPV− cohort (n=27; TFH n=14 vs TFL n=13), TFH was associated with improved OS (median OS 21.81 vs 9.79 months; HR 0.251, 95% CI 0.065–0.977; log-rank p=0.032). Transcriptomic profiling suggested HPV-dependent survival: in HPV− patients, LS was enriched for cell-cycle/DDR, and energy metabolism pathways (e.g., p53 pathway NES 1.86; FDR-adjusted p<0.0001), whereas in HPV+ patients, SS was enriched for inflammatory pathways (e.g., interferon-γ response NES −2.25; FDR-adjusted p<0.0001; TNF–NFκB) and LS for tumor-intrinsic metabolic/drug-handling and coagulation-related pathways (e.g., Xenobiotic metabolism, NES 2.13, FDR-adjusted p=0.0021; Coagulation). In the HPV+ cohort, exploratory genomic correlates of survival included enrichment of ARID1A pathogenic mutations (3/18, 16.7% LS vs 0/41, 0% SS; p=0.0073) and AKT2 amplifications (2/17, 11.8% LS vs 0/39, 0% SS; p=0.0292), consistent with tumor-intrinsic pathway alterations in LS. Conclusions: TF expression and HPV status may interact in TV-treated cervical cancer. While TFH was not associated with OS in the overall or HPV+ cohorts, TFH was associated with improved OS in HPV− disease. HPV-stratified transcriptomic analyses further suggest distinct biological contexts of benefit and lack thereof, supporting the need to HPV-stratified biomarker analyses for evaluating TV benefit in CxC, potentially extending to other ADCs, and motivating validation in independent datasets.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bruce et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192d4afab5b468c44161a4https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.5537
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper