PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Impact of BRCA pathogenic variants and novel targeted agents on ovarian reserve measured by anti-Müllerian hormone levels in young women with early breast cancer: A biomarker analysis of the PREFER study.

View Full Paper
LALuca AreccoAMArianna MeacciVDVirginia Delucchi

Key Points

  • To evaluate the impact of gBRCA pathogenic variants and targeted treatments on ovarian reserve measured by AMH levels in young women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer.
  • Conducted a biomarker analysis within the prospective PREFER study (NCT02895165)
  • Included premenopausal women treated with chemotherapy at the IRCCS San Martino Policlinic Hospital
  • Analyzed longitudinal AMH levels using mixed-effects models, taking patient and treatment characteristics into account.
  • Ovarian reserve, measured by AMH, exhibited a significant decline during chemotherapy (p<0.001), followed by partial recovery regardless of treatment.
  • Younger women (≤40 years) had higher baseline AMH levels (2.31 µg/L) and showed greater recovery post-treatment (p<0.001).
  • BRCA pathogenic variant carriers had lower baseline AMH levels (1.60 µg/L) and lesser post-treatment recovery compared to non-carriers (p=0.01).

Abstract

526 Background: The impact of germline BRCA (g BRCA ) pathogenic variants (PVs) and of novel targeted agents (anti-HER2 therapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors, or immunotherapy) on ovarian reserve in young women treated with chemotherapy (CT) for early breast cancer (BC) remains limited. This biomarker analysis of the PREFER study prospectively evaluated ovarian reserve using anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) according to main patient and treatment characteristics. Methods: We included premenopausal women enrolled in the prospective PREFER study (NCT02895165) and candidates to (neo)adjuvant CT at the coordinating centre, the IRCCS San Martino Policlinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy. Serial serum AMH measurements were performed at baseline (prior to any CT initiation), during, and after systemic treatment. Longitudinal changes in centrally measured AMH were analysed using mixed-effects models on log-transformed values. Analyses explored the impact of patient (including age and gBRCA status) and treatment (CT alone or with anti-HER2 therapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors, or immunotherapy) characteristics on AMH levels over time. Results: Between 2012 and 2025, 309 premenopausal patients were enrolled at the coordinating centre, of whom 194 were included in the present analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 37 (IQR 33-40) years, with 146 patients (75.3%) aged ≤40 years and 48 (24.7%) 41-45 years. Overall, 85 patients (43.8%) had hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative, 62 (32.0%) HER2-positive, and 47 (24.2%) triple-negative BC. In the entire cohort, AMH levels showed a marked decline during CT, followed by partial recovery during follow-up (p<0.001), irrespective of patient and treatment characteristics. Younger women showed higher baseline values (2.31 vs 1.11 µg/L for ≤40 years and 41-45 years) and greater post-treatment recovery (p<0.001). Among patients with known gBRCA status (n=147), patients harbouring gBRCA PVs (n=29, 19.7%) showed lower baseline levels (1.60 vs 2.18 µg/L for gBRCA carriers vs non-carriers) and a lower post-treatment recovery compared to non-carriers (n=118, 80.3%) (p=0.01). Regarding treatment exposure, 106 patients (54.6%) received CT alone, 62 (32.0%) CT plus anti-HER2 agents, 10 (5.2%) CT plus immunotherapy, and 16 (8.2%) CT followed by CDK4/6 inhibitors. No significant differences over time were observed according to treatment exposure (p=0.41); however, numerically lower mean AMH values after end of CT were observed among patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors and immunotherapy. Conclusions: In this PREFER biomarker analysis, older age and gBRCA PVs were associated with reduced ovarian recovery after treatment. Limited sample size precludes definitive conclusions on the gonadal impact of immunotherapy or CDK4/6 inhibitors; further analyses are urgently needed in this field.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arecco et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192d65fab5b468c44164eahttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.526
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper