PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science0 citationsOpen Access

Quantification of Gaze-Dependent Corrective Errors With Fresnel Prisms: Implications for Strabismus Management

View Full Paper
ETEizo TanakaSMShin MorisawaYMYuki Morizane

Key Points

  • This research aims to quantify gaze-dependent corrective errors associated with Fresnel prisms used in strabismus management.
  • Fresnel prisms (10Δ-40Δ) were tested on a two-axis rotation stage to measure deflection.
  • Geometric modeling predicted deflection with contour maps visualizing corrective errors using Kriging interpolation.
  • Two configurations, eyeward prism serration (EPS) and outward prism serration (OPS), were analyzed for their effects on gaze-dependent errors.
  • Corrective errors were significantly influenced by prism power and gaze position (P < 0.05).
  • Prisms > 20Δ showed complex errors, particularly in the EPS configuration—horizontally shifting gaze caused overcorrection.
  • Vertical gaze shifts not only intensified horizontal corrections but also introduced unintended vertical effects (P < 0.0001).

Abstract

Purpose: Fresnel prisms are widely used to manage strabismus. Although prism power is typically selected based on the deviation in the primary gaze position, actual deflection varies with the gaze direction because the angle of incidence changes. This study quantified gaze-dependent corrective errors in the secondary and tertiary positions. Methods: Fresnel prisms (10Δ-40Δ) were mounted on a two-axis rotation stage. Deflection was measured by projecting a laser spot onto a tangent screen 100 cm away while rotating the prisms horizontally and/or vertically (±30°). Two configurations were tested: eyeward prism serration (EPS) and outward prism serration (OPS). Geometric modeling was used to predict the deflection of a prism attached to a spectacle lens, and corrective errors across the gaze field were visualized as contour maps using Kriging interpolation. Results: Corrective errors varied with prism power, gaze position, and application method (EPS vs. OPS; factorial ANOVA, P 20Δ exhibited substantial, spatially complex errors. In the EPS configuration, horizontal gaze shifts toward the apex caused rapidly increasing overcorrection, whereas shifts toward the base led to undercorrection. In the OPS configuration, this gradient was reversed on the horizontal axis (P < 0.0001). Vertical gaze shifts not only amplified the horizontal corrective effects but also created unintended vertical components (perpendicular to the principal section). Conclusions: Fresnel prisms introduce nonlinear, gaze-dependent corrective errors despite the full correction of the strabismic deviation in the primary position. Recognition of these optical properties may help optimize therapeutic outcomes and enhance diagnostic accuracy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tanaka et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192da0fab5b468c44167eahttps://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.67.5.68
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Efficacy of Prism Adaptation in the Surgical Management of Acquired Esotropia1990 · 123 citations
  2. 2Spatial aspects of vertical phoria adaptation1993 · 41 citations
  3. 3Ophthalmic Prisms1983 · 112 citations
  4. 4The influence of age on adaptation of disparity vergence and phoria2017 · 25 citations
  5. 5Disconjugate ocular motor adaptation in rhesus monkey1992 · 43 citations