PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology1 citations

Outcomes of atypical EGFR mutations in early-stage EGFR -mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

View Full Paper
JAJacqueline V. AredoSSSurbhi SinghalMBMandeep Banwait

Key Points

  • Determine the outcomes of atypical EGFR mutations in early-stage EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.
  • Multi-institutional retrospective analysis of 417 patients with stage IA-IIIC EGFR-mutated NSCLC from 2010-2024.
  • Patients classified into classical EGFR (c-EGFR) or atypical EGFR (a-EGFR) mutations, compared using Kaplan-Meier analyses.
  • Utilized multivariable Cox regression to adjust for disease stage and treatment type.
  • A- EGFR mutations had a significantly lower 3-year disease-free survival (52.5% vs 71.2%; HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.21-2.42; P=0.003).
  • A- EGFR had higher recurrence to the ipsilateral lung (24% vs 14%) and bone (12% vs 6%).
  • Adjuvant osimertinib improved 3-year DFS in c-EGFR but demonstrated poor outcomes in a-EGFR, particularly with ex20ins (36.4%; P<0.001).

Abstract

8034 Background: Adjuvant osimertinib (osi) improves survival outcomes in patients (pts) with early-stage EGFR -mutated NSCLC harboring the classical EGFR exon 19 deletions (ex19del) or L858R mutation after surgery or chemoradiotherapy. Pts with early-stage NSCLC harboring atypical EGFR mutations were excluded from the respective clinical trials. Outcomes in this pt population remain unknown. Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of pts with stage IA-IIIC EGFR -mutated NSCLC (2010-2024) who were classified into two groups: those with tumors harboring classical EGFR mutations (c- EGFR : ex19del or L858R) or atypical EGFR mutations (a- EGFR : non-ex19del or L858R). Kaplan-Meier analyses compared disease-free survival (DFS), central nervous system (CNS) DFS, and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression adjusted for disease stage, definitive therapy, and adjuvant therapy. Results: Among 417 pts, 293 had tumors harboring c- EGFR and 124 had a- EGFR mutations. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (Table). Median follow-up was 4 years. Among pts not treated with adjuvant osi (n = 346), a- EGFR was associated with a significantly lower 3-year DFS compared to c- EGFR (52.5% vs 71.2%; HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.21-2.42; P = 0.003). Compared to c- EGFR , a- EGFR had higher rates of recurrence to the ipsilateral lung (24% vs 14%) and bone (12% vs 6%). A- EGFR was associated with a significantly lower 3-year CNS DFS (81.3% vs 87.1%; P = 0.002) and 5-year OS (77.7% vs 85.6%; P = 0.007) compared to c- EGFR . Among pts with a- EGFR mutations, EGFR exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) were associated with a significantly reduced 3-year DFS compared to other alterations (35.9% vs 68.2%; HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.10-3.77; P = 0.013), and with a lower 3-year CNS DFS (70.9% vs 92.2%; P = 0.028) and trend towards lower 5-year OS (71.3% vs 84.4%; P = 0.141). Among pts who underwent surgery for stage IB-IIIA NSCLC (n = 209), adjuvant osi improved 3-year DFS among c- EGFR (84.2% with osi vs 63.4% without osi) whereas a- EGFR had a lower 3-year DFS (36.4%; P < 0.001), which was driven by EGFR ex20ins compared to other alterations (19.9% vs 59.2%; P = 0.003). Conclusions: Atypical EGFR mutations are associated with inferior survival outcomes compared to classical EGFR mutations in early-stage NSCLC. EGFR ex20ins appear to drive poor outcomes among the atypical EGFR mutations. Novel adjuvant therapy strategies are warranted to improve definitive treatment of early-stage atypical EGFR -mutated NSCLC. Classical EGFR , N=293 (%) Atypical EGFR , N=124 (%) Ex19del / L858R 46 / 54 - Ex20ins / G719X / L861Q / Other - 49 / 26 / 17 / 8 Stage IA / IB / II / III 35 / 23 / 17 / 25 38 / 14 / 23 / 25 Surgery / XRT / CRT 81 / 8 / 8 82 / 8 / 7 Neoadjuvant Chemo / EGFR TKI 4 / 3 7 / 2 Adjuvant Chemo / EGFR TKI / Osi 26 / 25 / 23 26 / 8 / 4 3-year DFS* 71.2 52.5 3-year CNS DFS* 87.1 81.3 5-year OS* 85.6 77.7 *In non-adjuvant osi cohort (n=346). Statistically significant difference.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aredo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192e4efab5b468c4417573https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.8034
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of genomic subtype on intracranial outcomes in treatment-naive EGFR -mutant NSCLC with osimertinib (IGnITE).2026
  2. 2Real-world outcomes of atypical EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) treated with osimertinib (osi) vs. Afatinib or erlotinib2024 · 4 citations
  3. 3Real-world outcomes of osimertinib (Osi) vs. afatinib or erlotinib in patients with classical vs. atypical EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC).2024
  4. 4Assessing quality of care in early stage resected stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing and adjuvant (adj) therapy (tx).2024
  5. 5Clinical Impact of EGFR Mutation Subtypes on Treatment Outcomes in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Austrian Real-World Study2026 · 2 citations