PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Racial differences in clinical, genomic, and survival outcomes in colorectal cancer.

View Full Paper
NMNashrah MustafaYHYazan HamadnehKAKamal Al-Rabi

Key Result

Black race was associated with significantly worse overall survival in colorectal cancer compared to White race (HR 1.44, p<0.001), whereas Asian race showed similar mortality risk (HR 0.94).

Key Points

  • This study examines racial differences in clinical and genomic features of colorectal cancer to inform treatment strategies.
  • Clinical and genomic data collected from MSK-CHORD via cBioPortal, covering patients identified as Asian, White, or Black.
  • Variables analyzed in RStudio with chi-square, Fisher’s exact tests, and Kruskal–Wallis for group differences.
  • Survival analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox models, with significance at p < 0.05.
  • Age at diagnosis varied significantly (p < 0.001), with Asians and Blacks diagnosed younger than Whites.
  • Overall survival varied significantly (p < 0.001), with Asians having the longest survival (71.6 months) compared to Blacks (32.3 months).
  • Genomic differences included highest KRAS mutations in Blacks (56.8%) and highest TP53 mutations in Asians (81.5%), with Whites showing most MSI-H tumors.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=5,168)

Structured PICO

P
Population
5,168 colorectal cancer patients (White 83.9%, Asian 8.8%, Black 7.4%) from MSK-CHORD via cBioPortal.
O
Outcome
Overall survival, clinical features, metastatic patterns, and key mutationshard clinical

Significant racial disparities exist in colorectal cancer, with Black patients exhibiting the highest rates of KRAS mutations and the worst overall survival compared to White and Asian patients.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 1.44 (Blacks vs Whites); HR 0.94 (Asians vs Whites)

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

10593 Background: Racial differences influence colorectal cancer incidence, biology, and survival, but the clinical and genomic drivers remain unclear. This study evaluates race-based variation in clinical features, metastatic patterns, and key mutations in a large real-world cohort to improve risk stratification and promote equitable treatment. Methods: Clinical and genomic data were obtained from MSK-CHORD via cBioPortal, including patients identified as Asian, White, or Black. Variables were analysed in RStudio. Group differences were assessed using chi-square, Fisher’s exact tests, or Kruskal–Wallis. Survival was analysed with Kaplan–Meier and Cox models. Significance was set at p 0.05). Overall survival varied significantly (p < 0.001), highest in Asians (71.6 months) and Whites (54.3 months) and lowest in Blacks (32.3 months); Asians had similar mortality risk to Whites (HR 0.94), whereas Blacks had higher risk (HR 1.44). Genomic variation was notable: KRAS (p = 1.6×10⁻⁷) was highest in Blacks (56.8%), TP53 (p < 0.001) was highest in Asians (81.5%), and BRAF (p = 0.0046) was lowest in Blacks (7.1%), with no other genes differing. Conclusions: Racial differences were evident across outcomes. Black patients had the highest KRAS mutations and worst survival; Asians had the highest TP53 rates and best survival; Whites had the most MSI-H tumours. Other clinical features were similar. These patterns suggest biologic differences relevant to risk and treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mustafa et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in colorectal cancer (n=5,168). Race (Asian, Black, White) was evaluated on Overall survival (HR 1.44 (Blacks vs Whites); HR 0.94 (Asians vs Whites), p=<0.001). Black race was associated with significantly worse overall survival in colorectal cancer compared to White race (HR 1.44, p<0.001), whereas Asian race showed similar mortality risk (HR 0.94).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192e4efab5b468c4417600https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.10593
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Racial differences in genomic profiles and clinical outcomes of patients with colorectal carcinoma: A single institution retrospective study.2024
  2. 2Abstract A080: Racial disparities in genomic alterations and survival outcomes in prostate cancer: A comparative analysis of Black and White patients using MSK-IMPACT data2025
  3. 3Abstract PS4-01-11: Exploration of racial differences in variants of uncertain significance (VUS), ESR1 and PIK3CA mutation frequency, matched therapy use, and outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (mBC)2026
  4. 4Abstract PS06-03: Differences in ctDNA genomic profiles and outcomes of Black and White patients with metastatic breast cancer: results from a large multicenter consortium2024
  5. 5Abstract A076: Racial disparities in disease-free and overall survival among colorectal cancer patients in the prospective ColoCare cohort2024