PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery0 citationsOpen Access

Neglected acromioclavicular joint injury in coracoid process fractures: a retrospective cohort study

MLMyung-Sub LeeCLChang-Hun LeeYJYoung-Hoon Jo

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate the relationship between coracoid process fractures and concomitant AC joint injuries, focusing on imaging predictors.
  • Retrospective single-center cohort study with 60 patients with coracoid process fractures conducted from February 2016 to April 2023.
  • Fractures classified by location; associated SSSC injuries evaluated using 3D CT imaging.
  • Statistical analyses involved logistic regression and ROC curve analysis for identifying predictors of AC joint injury.
  • 15 out of 60 patients exhibited AC joint injuries, all with base-type coracoid fractures.
  • Logistic regression identified a significant association between base fractures and SSSC injuries (OR = 21.0, p < 0.001).
  • A displacement gap of ≥ 5.82 mm predicted concurrent AC joint injury with an AUC of 0.741.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Coracoid process fractures are frequently associated with injuries to the superior suspensory shoulder complex, including the acromioclavicular (AC) joint. However, concomitant AC joint injuries may be overlooked in the acute phase, potentially limiting treatment options. This study aimed to investigate the association between coracoid process fractures and SSSC injuries and to identify imaging-based predictors of concomitant AC joint injury. Methods A retrospective single-center cohort study including 60 patients with coracoid process fractures was conducted between February 2016 and April 2023. Coracoid fractures were classified based on anatomical location, and associated SSSC injuries were categorized according to the involved structures. These injuries were evaluated using 3D shoulder CT. Morphological deformity of the SSSC was assessed by measuring the glenoclavicular distance (GCD)—a longitudinal parameter—on final follow-up clavicle AP radiographs. In base fractures, the medial displacement gap was measured on sagittal CT. Statistical analyses included logistic regression and ROC curve analysis to identify predictors of AC joint injury. Results Among the 60 patients, fractures were located anteriorly in 27 cases, in the middle region in 5 cases, and at the base in 28 cases. AC joint injury was identified in 15 patients, all of whom had base-type fractures. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between base fractures and SSSC injuries (OR = 21.0, p < 0.001). The GCD was significantly different between affected and contralateral sides in base fracture cases (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that a displacement gap of ≥ 5.82 mm was predictive of concurrent AC joint injury (AUC = 0.741). Conclusions Coracoid process base fractures are significantly associated with injuries to other components of the SSSC. In particular, a displacement gap of 5.82 mm or more suggests a higher likelihood of previously unrecognized AC joint injury. Level of evidence III, retrospective cohort study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192e79fab5b468c44179e5https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-026-06356-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper