PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Mobile Health Interventions Across the Stroke Care Continuum: A Scoping Review

View Full Paper
DKDahyeon KooSJSeunggyun JeongKJKyumin Jang

Key Points

  • This review explores the use of mobile health interventions across various phases of stroke care to identify gaps and opportunities for integration.
  • Conducted a scoping review of studies published from January 2019 to March 2025 on mHealth interventions for stroke care.
  • Searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, identifying 4524 records; 17 studies met inclusion criteria.
  • Included various study designs: five randomized controlled trials, five non-randomized studies, four cohort studies, and three diagnostic accuracy studies.
  • Identified a fragmented mHealth landscape in stroke care, with six studies focused on acute diagnosis and ten on chronic rehabilitation.
  • Most studies targeted a single care phase, with a median sample size of 37 (range 10–2249).
  • Noted a significant gap in early rehabilitation research, with little evidence supporting cognitive and secondary prevention efforts.

Abstract

Stroke causes approximately 12.2 million new cases and 6.5 million deaths annually, with survivors requiring coordinated care across pre-hospital, acute, rehabilitative, and preventive phases. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies, including smartphone applications, wearable sensors, and tablet-based platforms, have shown clinical potential across these contexts, yet a structured mapping of their distribution across the full stroke care continuum is lacking. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for publications from January 2019 to March 2025. Studies evaluated mHealth interventions in which the mobile platform directly performed diagnostic, therapeutic, or rehabilitative functions in stroke populations. Of 4524 records identified, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Studies originated from eight countries and used heterogeneous designs: five randomized controlled trials, five non-randomized studies, four cohort studies, and three diagnostic accuracy studies. Median sample size was 37 participants (range 10–2249). Evidence concentrated at two poles: six studies addressed acute diagnosis and ten addressed rehabilitation, predominantly in the chronic phase. One study addressed secondary prevention; two targeted early rehabilitation, the period of maximum neuroplasticity after discharge. All seventeen studies covered a single care phase. Smartphone platforms dominated acute contexts; wearable and mixed-modality systems were confined to rehabilitation. The mHealth stroke landscape is fragmented and phase-specific, exhibiting a silo effect in which interventions operate as isolated tools rather than components of an integrated care system. An important gap is the near-absence of research in early rehabilitation. Future priorities include cross-continuum design, expansion into cognitive and secondary prevention domains, and progression toward adequately powered trials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192ea9fab5b468c4417c6ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15114121
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper