PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Rethinking MRI surveillance after breast cancer in the context of persistent racial disparities in mortality.

View Full Paper
EME. Robert McDonaldNRNathaly Perez RojasHNHayat Naqvi

Key Points

  • To assess the effectiveness of MRI surveillance in detecting breast cancer recurrence, particularly among different racial groups.
  • Retrospective analysis of 41,041 breast MRI exams in an urban health system from 2014 to 2025.
  • Categorized exams into high-risk screening, supplemental, and surveillance for personal history of breast cancer.
  • Used logistic regression to estimate odds ratio for true and false positives adjusted for age and race.
  • Detection rates were higher in the surveillance group (TP rate 21.0 vs 12.4) with OR 1.53 (95% CI 1.26–1.86), p<0.001.
  • Higher cancer detection rates for supplemental MRI compared to high-risk screening (OR 1.35, p<0.001).
  • Black women had higher TP rates across all MRI categories, with the highest in surveillance MRI (31.9 vs 20.5, OR 1.62, p=0.010).

Abstract

1675 Background: Detection of asymptomatic breast cancer recurrence by imaging is associated with improved survival compared to detection after symptoms develop. Currently, both the American Cancer Society and ASCO recommend against routine MRI for patients with a history of breast cancer and no clinical findings, unless they meet specific high-risk criteria. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria similarly characterizes surveillance MRI as conditionally appropriate, supporting its use only when additional risk factors are present. Since randomized trials to address surveillance strategies in diverse populations are unlikely to be feasible, we performed an observational study comparing MRI performance in intermediate and high-risk screening populations, and women with a history of breast cancer, stratified by race. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 41,041 breast MRI exams performed in an urban health system from 1/2/2014 to 10/29/2025. In Pennsylvania, insurance covers supplemental MRI for women with dense breasts, and in our network, screening MRI is generally performed in asymptomatic patients current with mammography. Exams were categorized as high-risk screening (n=15,682, 38%), supplemental (n=10,905, 27%), or surveillance for a personal history of breast cancer (n=11,476, 28%). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratio for true and false positives by indication adjusted for age and race. Results: Cancer detection rates were higher in the surveillance group compared with high risk screening (true positive TP rate 21.0, n=241 vs 12.4, n=194), a 53% difference after adjusting for age and race (OR 1.53 1.26–1.86, p<0.001), with similar false-positive rates (7.5%, n=857 vs 8.7%, n=1,359; OR 1.02 0.93–1.11, p=0.7). MRI cancer detection rate was higher for supplemental than high-risk screening (OR 1.35 1.24–1.46, p<0.001). Notably, in a subset comparison of screening MRI in Black vs. white women (n=37,383), TP rates were higher among Black women than white women across all MRI indications. The highest TP rate was observed in Black women undergoing surveillance MRI (31.9 vs. 20.5; OR 1.62 1.11, 2.31, p=0.010), followed by supplemental (25.6 vs. 14,5; OR 1.84 1.17, 2.77, p=0.005), and high-risk (21.6 vs. 11.4; OR 1.97 1.22, 3.03, p=0.003). The TP rate remained higher for Black compared with white women for first MRI as well as subsequent MRI for surveillance, high-risk, and supplemental screening. Conclusions: Black women in the U.S. have 40% higher breast cancer mortality compared to non-Hispanic white women, and early detection offers the best chance for optimal survival. Our findings suggest surveillance MRI identifies a higher burden of clinically occult cancer than high-risk screening MRI, especially among Black women. Expanding access to surveillance MRI may help address persistent racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McDonald et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192ea9fab5b468c4417cadhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.1675
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Abstract PS1-06-04: Factors Associated with Receipt of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Cancer Screening Among Racially/Ethnically Diverse High-Risk Women2026
  2. 2Uptake of screening breast MRI in high-risk patients without a personal history of breast cancer.2026
  3. 3Radiology Surveillance for Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2026
  4. 4Abstract 3474: Racial disparities in receipt of surveillance mammography after breast cancer diagnosis2024
  5. 5British society of breast radiology annual scientific meeting abstracts2026