PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Global development and validation of the Lung Cancer Prevention Score (LCPS): A quantitative framework linking policy strength, incidence, and outcomes across 40 countries.

View Full Paper
ATAdarsh Vardhan TangellaSRShamanth Manjunatha ReddyAGAshwin Gajre

Key Result

A Lung Cancer Prevention Score (LCPS) ≥75 was associated with a significantly lower mortality-to-incidence ratio compared to a score <60 (0.45 vs 0.65; p<0.001).

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop and validate the Lung Cancer Prevention Score (LCPS) as a framework linking prevention policies to cancer outcomes across different countries.
  • Created two LCPS models: Policy LCPS based on 12 weighted domains and Data-Driven LCPS using various health and economic metrics.
  • Utilized data from GLOBOCAN 2022, WHO GTCR 2023, World Bank, and UNDP HDR 2023 covering 40 countries.
  • Analyses included correlation, regression, Bland–Altman agreement, and ROC AUC for the mortality-to-incidence ratio.
  • Policy LCPS and Data-Driven LCPS moderately correlated (r = 0.31; 95% CI –0.04–0.60).
  • High-policy countries (LCPS ≥75) had 17% smoking prevalence and a mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) of 0.45, significantly lower than lower-policy countries (LCPS <60; smoking 27%, MIR 0.65; p <0.001).
  • Each 10-point increase in Data-Driven LCPS predicted 2.4 fewer lung cancer cases per 100,000 (β = –0.24 ± 0.07; p = 0.002).

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=40)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

P
Population
40 countries (G20 + 20 others) with data from GLOBOCAN 2022, WHO GTCR 2023, World Bank, and UNDP HDR 2023
I
Intervention
Lung Cancer Prevention Score (LCPS) evaluation (Policy and Data-Driven models)
O
Outcome
Correlation between LCPS and age-standardized incidence (ASIR), mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR), and smoking prevalence

The Lung Cancer Prevention Score provides a validated framework connecting prevention policy to measurable cancer burden across countries.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0.45% vs 0.65%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

10518 Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer worldwide. Despite advances in tobacco control, national prevention efforts remain fragmented. We developed and validated the Lung Cancer Prevention Score (LCPS), a 0–100 composite linking prevention policy strength with real-world outcomes for global benchmarking and equity tracking. Methods: Two LCPS models were created. Policy LCPS quantified 12 weighted domains: smoke-free laws, TAPS bans, ≥50% pictorial warnings, ≥75% excise tax, plain packaging, legal-age limits, e-cigarette control, LDCT screening, asbestos ban, radon plan, clean-cooking access, and occupational carcinogen controls. Data-Driven LCPS combined age-standardized incidence (ASIR), mortality (ASMR), mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR), smoking prevalence, GDP, health expenditure, and HDI (normalized 0–1; higher = stronger prevention). Data from GLOBOCAN 2022, WHO GTCR 2023, World Bank, and UNDP HDR 2023 covered 40 countries (G20 + 20 others). Analyses included correlation, regression (adjusted for GDP, HDI), Bland–Altman agreement, and ROC AUC for MIR ≤0.60. Results: Among 32 complete datasets, Policy and Data-Driven LCPS correlated moderately (r = 0.31; 95% CI –0.04–0.60). Discrimination of favorable outcomes (MIR ≤0.60) showed AUC 0.68 vs 0.77. High-policy countries (≥75) had lower smoking (17%) and MIR (0.45) than those 90 % P 1 Yes = 1 Occ carcinogen ctrl P 1.5 Yes = 1 ASIR D 1 Lower = better (1–scaled ASIR) ASMR D 1 Lower = better (1–scaled ASMR) MIR D 1 Lower = better (1–scaled MIR) Smoking prev D 1</ja

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tangella et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Lung cancer (n=40). High-policy Lung Cancer Prevention Score (LCPS ≥75) vs. Low-policy LCPS (<60) was evaluated on Mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) (p=<0.001). A Lung Cancer Prevention Score (LCPS) ≥75 was associated with a significantly lower mortality-to-incidence ratio compared to a score <60 (0.45 vs 0.65; p<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192ea9fab5b468c4417cfahttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.10518
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper